IN THE COURT OF XXX, FAMILY COURT; KARKARDOOMA COURTS, DELHI.

 

H.M.A. CASE NO. ________ OF 2017.

 

IN THE MATTER OF :-

XXXXX                       : PETITIONER

VERSUS

XXXXX                        : RESPONDENT

I N D E X

                                                                                                                  

S.NO.        PARTICULARS                                      PAGES      C.F. 

 

1.          MEMO OF PARTIES + C.F.           

 

2.          PETITION FOR DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE BY A DECREE OF DIVORCE A AMENDED BY THE MARRIAGE LAWS (AMENDMENT) ACT, 1976 UNDER SECTION 13(1)(ia) and 13 (1) (ib ) OF HINDU MARRIAGE ACT, 1955.

 

3.          SUPPORTING AFFIDAVIT.

 

4.          LIST OF DOCUMENTS.

 

5.          VAKALTNAMA.                   

 

 

DELHI                                                                         PETITIONER

THROUGH

DATED

 

ADVOCATES  

 


 

IN THE COURT OF XX , FAMILY COURT; KARKARDOOMA COURTS, DELHI.

 

H.M.A. CASE NO. ________ OF 2017.

 

IN THE MATTER OF :-

XXXXXXX                           : PETITIONER

VERSUS

XXXXXXX                           : RESPONDENT

 

MEMO OF PARTIES

XXXXXXXX                                           : PETITIONER                                                           

 

VERSUS

 

XXXXXXXX                                            : RESPONDENT

 

 

DELHI                                                                         PETITIONER

THROUGH

DATED

ADVOCATES  


IN THE COURT OF XX , FAMILY COURT; TIS KARKARDOOMA COURTS, DELHI.

 

H.M.A. CASE NO. ________ OF 2017.

 

IN THE MATTER OF :-

XXXXXX                                                 : PETITIONER                                                           

 

VERSUS

 

XXXXXX                                                  : RESPONDENT

 

A PETITION UNDER SECTION 13 (1)(ia) & (ib) OF THE HINDU MARRIAGE ACT, 1955 ON BEHALF OF THE PETITIONER FOR DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE BY A DECREE OF DIVORCE AS AMENDED BY THE MARRIAGE LAWS (AMENDMENT) ACT 1976.

 

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH :-

 

1.          That a marriage between the parties hereto was duly solemnized at Delhi according to the Hindu Customs, Rites and ceremonies on 05.05.1980 at ……...

 

2.          That petitioner is a law abiding citizen of India and always maintain peace and tranquility, given rapt attention to discharge social, moral obligation and liability in a magnificent way and up till now there is no any redressal of grievances against the petitioner at any forum.

 

3.          That, the status and place of residence of the parties to the marriage before and at the time of filing the petition are given below :-

 

H U S B A N D / P E T I T I O N E R

 

                                      Status         Age             Place of Residence

Before Marriage            Bachelor     ____          ……..

Hindu         Years          

 

At time of Filing the     Married      _____                

Present Petition.           Hindu         Years          ………

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

W I F E / R E S P O N D E N T

                                      Status         Age             Place of Residence

Before Marriage           Spinster     ____                    ---------

Hindu         Years                    --------

 
At time of Filing the     Married      ____         

Present Petition.           Hindu         Years          ………

 

 

4.      That the petitioner and respondent was Hindu at the time of solemnization of their marriage and they continue to profess the same religion till the date of filing the present petition.

 

5.       That after the marriage, the parties lived as husband and wife and cohabited with each other. The petitioner shifted to Delhi in XX . That out of the said wedlock four children was born namely 1) XXX aged about XX years, 2) XXX aged about XX  years 3) XXX aged about XX years 4) XXX aged about XX  years. All children are living with the respondent at the house of the petitioner and never desired to discharge her matrimonial duties. That all the sons are working and drawing a good salary better then petitioner.

 

6.          That the petitioner’s daughter is presently pursuing Engineering and is totally dependent upon him for all her expenses including her college fees.

 

7.       That the petitioner was married to the respondent on 05.05.1980 in a simple ceremony at Delhi. That marriage between the parties was a purely arranged marriage and no dowry articles whatsoever were given or taken or demanded by either parties or their relatives. The marriage of the Petitioner and Respondent was solemnized in a low profile manner.

 

8.      That the petitioner and his wife lived last together at the petitioner’s residence at XXXXXXXXX and now till date the respondent living with petitioner but separately and in 2015 Respondent deserted the Petitioner. Further marriage of the petitioner with the respondent is 36 years old and there was no complaint on behalf of the respondent in those 36 years. It is further submitted that the said property was purchased by the petitioner in the name of petitioner on account of natural love and affection.

 

9.      That the petitioner is working as a Multi Tasking Staff at XXXXXXXX situated at XXXXXXXXXX and drawing a Salary of Rs.22,182/- per month after making necessary deductions from his salary.

 

10.     That later on due to interference of the brother of respondent, relationship between the petitioner and the respondent became sour. It was the brother of the respondent who instigated the respondent against the petitioner which ultimately resulted into the respondent filing the maintenance petition before the Ld. M.M. Delhi and after making all efforts for reconcile the issue by the petitioner but respondent not bothered to carry forward for resolving the issue between the petitioner and respondent hence the petitioner is force to file the present petition.

 

11.     Immediately after marriage, respondent’s behavior was very rude for the parents of the petitioner and she did not help of her mother in law day to day domestic work of house for which the Petitioner in very discomfortable position.

 

12.     Though Petitioner somehow managed to come out of this trauma and avoided to share this habit of the Respondent to any one from his family needless to say Petitioner requested the Respondent to avoid this kind of behavior so that any sort of misunderstanding should not come in their married life.

 

13.     But thereafter she again creating nuisance and cruelty with the petitioner and his family members and respondent demanding another accommodation separate from the locality of petitioner parents. After this petitioner’s life was started worse day by day due to respondent’s brother and parent interfere a-lot in day to day life of the petitioner and respondent.

 

14.     During the stay of the respondent at her matrimonial home, Respondent did not respond to the love and affection given by the parents of the Petitioner, but somehow Petitioner and his family members kept showering their love upon the Respondent.

 

15.     That it is pertinent to mention that despite this fact, the petitioner’s parents gave the respondent all affection and time to adjust to adapt to the matrimonial house.

 

16.     That it is further submitted that the respondent’s brother is threatening the petitioner that incase the petitioner comes to pick her up then he would thrash the petitioner

 

17.     That the petitioner’s family is very much concerned about the respondent and did all acts for her welfare. That petitioner being affectionate husband did all acts for the care of the respondent.

 

18.     That Petitioner despite rude behaviour of the Respondent tried to make his marriage repaired but due to continuous acts of cruelties committed by the Respondent and deserting the Petitioner without any reasons for considerable period, now Petitioner has not left with any other remedies except to file this Petition.

 

19.     That after marriage petitioner and his family members, treated, the respondent with great love and affection. Respondent, for some time, remained obedient to petitioner, but after some time she started harassing the petitioner by her rough behavior.

 

20.    That however, the said marriage failed and turned into nightmare for petitioner on account of adamant, lacks of sensitivity, unjustified conduct and behaviour, values, sustained course of abusive and humiliating treatment, discommode by the respondent. Therefore, the petitioner feeling deep anguishes, disappointment, frustration due to act and attitude and conduct of the respondent.

 

21.     But the behavior of the respondent never improved and respondent behavior changed with family and petitioner doubt some her mental status.

 

22.    That since solemnization of marriage between the parties, the attitude, conduct and behaviour of respondent towards the petitioner as well as family members was indignant and rude, treated the petitioner with all sorts of cruelties to such an extent that now it is not possible for the petitioner to pull on any further with the respondent as the same is now blot on the pious name of the institution of marriage and further detrimental to the health, life and reputation of the petitioner.

 

23.    That Respondent started behaving abruptly with Petitioner just after the few days of their marriage. Respondent gets extremely agitated on any routine item / event, which any other normal person would not even notice.

Respondent’s hyper anger episode consists of few or all of the following behaviors which varies with the severity of the manic attacks

- Shouting

- Usage of abusive language

- Repetitive Suicide threats

- Suspicion

- Frequent Mood swings

- Irritability

- Locking herself up in the bathroom or room

- Threaten to exit the matrimonial home

- Stroking of hands (Respondent broke her glass / plastic bangles a few times) Bitten her arm to malign his reputation.

- She was wearing accessory bangles.

In anger she used to throw utensils and pickle bottles on some occasions.

-  She used to blackmail committing suicide.

- Thumping her chest

- Threatens to take divorce, claiming that her brother have very influential lawyer and is well connected politically

- During the anger episodes of Respondent, whenever Petitioner tried to calm down the Respondent, intensity of manic episodes has increased

- Very high and unrealistic expectations

- Swollen body, Abnormal breathing

- Faints couple of seconds

- Vomiting/Nausea

- Give Threats

- Taking all things in a negative manner

- Don’t listen to anyone

 

24.    That the respondent showed her extreme attachment with her relatives. Respondent was in day to day contact by phone and making conversation for 2-3 hours daily on each and every issue with her parents and mostly her brother. They make ill advice and incite the Respondent against the petitioner and his family members and in result of which respondent making insult, misbehaving, abusing, assaulting to the petitioner.

 

25.    That the petitioner tried his level best for restoration of conjugal life but it is the respondent who has always created such type of situation and circumstances that cannot reasonably be asked to be a good conduct but it is the petitioner who tried to resume his married life. Due to cruel act and attitude of the respondent, the petitioner is unable to continue life with the respondent. The behavior of the respondent towards the petitioner causes reasonable apprehension in the mind of the petitioner that it is not safe for him to continue his matrimonial relationship with the respondent. It is also submitted the behavior of the respondent towards the petitioner, causes reasonable apprehension in the mind of the petitioner that it is not safe for him to continue his matrimonial relationship with the respondent.

 

26.    That from the acts and conduct on the part of the respondent, it is clear that Respondent had buried the institution of marriage forever and it is not possible for the petitioner to pull on the marriage any further due to said fraudulent and cruel behavior of the respondent.

 

27.    That in consideration to all the acts and circumstances mentioned above, it is very difficult for the petitioner to live with the respondent as the petitioner not only apprehends danger to his life and liberty but the same is also detrimental to his honour, reputation and social status and as such, the petitioner is entitled to the grant of the divorce on the ground of cruelty.

  

28.    That it is something very strange that the treatment and behavior of the respondent was also very disrespectful and querulous towards her mother in law. That the respondent could not see her mother in law eye to eye for the reasons best known to her.

 

29.    That the constant ill-treatment of the respondent caused unbearable tension, mental agony in the mind of the  Petitioner / husband and his mother. That the petitioner was not able to find any solution to this everlasting problem of unbearable misbehavior and cruelty at the hands of his wife / respondent.

 

30.    That although the list of cruelty, harassment, criminal acts done by respondent, under her illnesses or with the undue support and mis-guidance of her family members, is very lengthy, yet, a few major acts and incidents of cruelty towards the petitioner have been mentioned.

 

31.     That despite inflicting lots of cruelty upon the petitioner, the petitioner tried his best to have a word with the respondent but due to her aggression and violent behavior, it seems to be risky if respondent joins back   her matrimonial house.

 

32.    Due to frequent complaints received against the respondent, petitioner was forced to conduct his contractual obligation on the medical grounds, thereby causing monetary as well as professional loss to the petitioner, in view of the fact his contract was of five months about the atrocities of the respondent, petitioner has to return in two month. Due to this kind of behavior of respondent, petitioner failed to concentrate on his professional career, or failed to upgrade his professional qualifications due to mental cruelty caused by the respondent, petitioner suffered personally, financially as well as professionally.

 

33.    That respondent never cared to go ahead with established customs i.e. in both the Karvachauth occasions, respondent did not kept fast for the petitioner, when petitioner family requested the respondent to observe customs, then respondent flatly refused on the ground that she does not believe in these kind of orthodox customs, respondent never treated the petitioner as her husband and she did not comply with her matrimonial obligations. That respondent deliberately left the house as she was not interested in making the marriage successful. Further respondent’s brother used to interfere in the matrimonial life of the petitioner and she used to communicate with her brother for long hours, as respondent was taking much interest in the matrimonial litigation of her brother and which was also one of the reason that respondent never cared for her own matrimonial life. That respondent does not have any interest to join the house of the petitioner.

 

34.    That the above narrated conduct and attitude of the respondent clearly, evidently and without any least doubt shows that (i) Respondent has broken all relations with the Petitioner as she is currently staying at petitioner’s home house at first floor after taking the Jewellery with her which is lying in her custody (ii) Respondent is determined to implicate the petitioner and his mother in false criminal case just to take revenge upon them by hook or crook for the reason best known to her,  (iii) it further proves that the respondent / wife has a mental & other illnesses which has resulted all these abrupt behaviors in her. Under these circumstances, the petitioner is left with no option, except to file the present divorce petition at least for the safety of his own life and that of the life of his mother against the apprehended and threatened danger from the respondent’s end. It is further submitted that the life of the petitioner and his mother would always be in danger and full of tension if they live with the respondent in any manner in future.

 

35.    That it is stated that the acts conducts and behavior of the respondent and the circumstances intentionally or deliberately perpetrated and / or created by the respondent on the petitioner and against him are such that Respondent have caused immense mental torture and agony to the petitioner without any fault on his part and that to without any rhyme or reason. Since the respondent, after their marriage has treated the petitioner with utmost cruelty, as detailed in the foregoing paras, therefore the petitioner is entitled to dissolution of marriage by decree of divorce under section 13(1)(ia) & (ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 as amended by marriage laws upto date.

 

36.    That the petitioner has not, in any manner, condoned the cruelty of the respondent.

 

37.    That now the petitioner has lost his patience and as such is unable to continue with the said uncertain and unbroken tie. Hence the petitioner is left with no other remedy but to approach this Hon’ble Court. Hence this petition.

 

38.    That the petition is not being presented in collusion with the respondent.

 

39.    That there has not been any unnecessary or improper delay in filing this petition.

 

40.    That there is no legal ground why the relief should not be granted.

 

41.     That the petitioner has not in any manner been accessory to or connived at and condoned the acts complained of.

 

42.    That the marriage was solemnized and the parties resided together within the limits of ordinary original jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court. The parties lastly resided together as husband and wife at Janak Puri. Hence this Hon’ble Court has got the jurisdiction to try and entertain the petition.

 

43.    That the prescribed court fee has been paid and affixed on the petition.

 

PRAYER :-

It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that a decree of divorce be passed dissolving the marriage between the parties.

OR

Any other relief which this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case be also granted in favor of the petitioner and against the respondent.

 

PETITIONER

DELHI                         THROUGH

DATED                                                                       

ADVOCATES  

VERIFICATION :-

The above named petitioner states on solemn affirmation that the paras No.1 to ____ of the petition are true upon petitioner’s knowledge and paras ____ to _____ of the petition are true upon information received and believed to be true. Last para is prayer made to this Hon’ble Court. Verified at Delhi on this ____ day of April, 2017.

 

PETITIONER


 

IN THE COURT OF XX , FAMILY COURT; KARKARDOOMA COURTS, DELHI.

 

H.M.A. CASE NO. ________ OF 2017.

 

IN THE MATTER OF :-

XXXXXX           : PETITIONER

VERSUS

XXXXXX           : RESPONDENT

 

A F F I D A V I T

I, XXXXXX, aged about ___ years S/o XXXXXX R/o XXXXXXX, do hereby solemnly affirm and declare as under :-

 

1.       That the marriage between the Petitioner and the respondent was solemnized according to Hindu Rites and ceremonies on 05.05.1980 at Delhi.

 

2.      That the contents of the accompanying petition under Section 13 (1)(ia) & (ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, has been drafted by my counsel under my instructions, contents of the same are true and correct to my knowledge and the same may kindly be read as part and parcel of this affidavit as the contents of the same are not being repeated herein for the sake of brevity and to avoid repetition.

 

3.      That the contents of the accompanying petition with regard to cruelties may also be read as part hereof which are not being repeated here for the sake of brevity.

 

4.          That the marriage between the parties has been completely broken down and there is no possibility of the parties living together.

 

5.          That the accompanying petition has not been filed in collusion with the respondent.

 

6.          That there is no impediment in granting the relief to the petitioner.

 

7.          That there has not been any improper delay in filing the petition.

 

8.          That the petitioner has not in any manner been accessory to or connived at and condoned the acts complained of.

 

DEPONENT

VERIFICATION :-

          I, the above named deponent, do hereby verify that the contents of the above affidavit are true and correct to my knowledge, no part of it is false and nothing material has been concealed therefrom.

Verified at Delhi on this ___ day of April, 2017.

 

DEPONENT

 

 

 

footer_logo

Quick Contact
Copyright ©2025 Lawvs.com | All Rights Reserved