BEFORE XXXXXX; LD. SOLE ARBITRATOR;
DELHI INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE;
NEW DELHI.
ARB. CASE NO. DIAC/XXXXX
IN THE MATTER OF:
XXXXX : CLAIMANTS
VERSUS
XXXXX : RESPONDENTS
N.D.O.H.:-
**.**.20**
APPLICATION TO FORMALLY EXHIBIT THE ORIGINAL
ATTORNEY’s DATED 12.07.2019 BY CLAIMANT NO.1 AND CLAIMANT NO. 2 RESPECTIVELY IN
FAVOUR OF CLAIMANT NO.3 WHICH HAD ALREADY BEEN FILED ON RECORDALONG WITH THE
EVIDENCE.
MOST RESPECTFULLY
SHOWETH:
1.
Admittedly, the Claimant
no.1 and Claimant no.2 are duly represented by Claimant no.3 as their Attorney
Holder vide the Attorney dated 12.07.2019 AND Attorney dated 12.07.2019
respectively [“the Attorney”] to lead evidence on their behalf.
Admittedly, the Claimants are legal heirs of XXXXX, who infact established the
Firm XXXXX Auto Electrical’s. The attorney’s have been duly filed alongwith the
evidence at page no.294 and page no.297 respectively alongwith the evidence.
2.
That the Attorney is the
son of Claimant no.1 and the brother of Claimant no.2. The dispute admittedly
pertains to the documents on records and pertains to close knit family members
i.e. Respondent No.1, who is real uncle of the Attorney and Respondent no.2 [a
company fraudulently established by the Respondent No.1 only]. Admittedly, all
the Claimants have been duly construed as partners in the Firm- XXXXX as
reflected vide various pleadings and official records duly admitted before this
Hon’ble Court. In any case, the Claimant No.3 had been around 18 years at the
relevant time and thus was completely aware of the modalities and the personal
knowledge about the transactions pertaining to the Firm’s business and facts
stipulated in the Statement of Claim and thus competent to depose not only in
individual capacity but also as Attorney for and on behalf of Claimant no.1 and
Claimant no.2.
3.
That the evidence so
filed before this Hon’ble tribunal had been of Claimant no.3 in his individual
capacity as well as attorney of the other claimants. Admittedly, the Attorney
authorizing him to depose for and on behest of the Claimant no.1 and Claimant
no.3 has already been on record and filed along with the evidence. However,
inadvertently while marking the exhibits, inadvertently the original Attorney
filed and already on record was inadvertently not exhibited.
4.
By way of this
application, the applicant herein requests this Hon’ble tribunal to formally
exhibit the Attorney as Exhibit-CW-1/1A for the sake of convenience and in the
interest of justice.
5.
Admittedly, the evidence
duly mentions the factum of representation of the Claimant no.1 and Claimant
no.2 through Attorney and the original attorney’s had been duly attached/filed
alongwith the Evidence.
6.
That no loss or prejudice
would be caused to the Defendants as already the Attorney’s had been on record
and extensive cross- examination has taken place qua the same. Further, it is
trite in law that in an arbitration, the rigors of CPC and Evidence Act are not
attracted.
In light of the above, it is earnestly
requested that:
A. To allow marking of Exhibit no.-CW-1/1A AND Exhibit
no. CW-1/1Bor by any other marking upon the original Attorney’s dated
12.07.2019 respectively, which are already filed on record and filed alongwith
the Evidence on Affidavit of CW-1.
B.
Any
other order, as this Court deems fit.
DELHI CLAIMANTS
THROUGH
DATED
XXXXX
ADVOCATES
XXXXX
XXXXX
EMAIL:
XXXXXXX
BEFORE XXXXX; LD. SOLE ARBITRATOR;
DELHI INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE;
NEW DELHI.
ARB. CASE NO. DIAC/XXXXX
IN THE MATTER OF:
XXXXX
: CLAIMANTS
VERSUS
XXXXX : RESPONDENTS
AFFIDAVIT
1. That I am the Claimant no.3 and attorney
holder of Claimant No.1 and 2 duly represented as their Attorney Holder vide
Attorney dated 12.07.2019 and am fully conversant with the facts leading to
filing the accompanying petition and I am competent to swear this affidavit.
2. That the contents of accompanying application has been drafted
by my counsel under my instructions and its content have been read over and
explained to me in my vernacular, which are true and correct to my knowledge
and belief and its contents shall be read as part and parcel of this affidavit,
which are not repeated herein for the sake of brevity.
DEPONENT
VERIFICATION:-
Verified
at New Delhi on this ____ day of April,
2024 that the contents of the above affidavit are correct to my knowledge, no
part of it is false and nothing has been concealed therefrom.
DEPONENT