IN THE COURT OF LD.
CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, GHAZIABAD COURTS, UTTAR PRADESH
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT No.
______ OF XXXX
IN THE MATTER OF: -
Smt. XXXXXXXXX … Complainant
Versus
Smt. XXXXXXXXX & ors. … Accuseds
PS: XXXXXXXX
APPLICATION
UNDER SECTION 156(3) OF CR.P.C FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE COMPLAINANT SEEKING
DIRECTION TO THE SHO P.S- XXXXXXXXXXX, FOR REGISTRATION OF F.I.R. AGAINST THE
ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENCE UNDER
SECTIONS 205, 378, 379, 415, 416, 417,
419, 420, 406, 463, 464, 470, 471, 34 OF INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860 AND UNDER
SECTION 66C OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACT, 2000
MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:-
1.
That the Complainant
has approached this Hon’ble Court being aggrieved by the illegal actions of the
accused persons, which has resulted in severe losses to the complainant and has
resulted in grievous mental injuries being caused to the complainant.
2.
That the complainant is
a law-abiding citizen, with full faith in the administration of justice.
3.
That herein after imposter of X shall be
referred as accused no.01, XX shall be referred as accused no.02, Officials of XXX Bank BO-XXXXXXX, New
Delhi-XXXXXX shall be as accused no.03,
XXXX shall be referred as accused no.04, XXXXX shall be referred as accused no.05, XXXXXX shall be
referred as accused no.06, Officials of Sub Registrar office XXXXXXX, Uttar
Pradesh-XXXXXX shall be referred as accused No.07.
4.
That the complainant
purchased the property bearing number-plot
no. X, XXXXXXXXX, Uttar Pradesh-XXXXXX. The said property is divided under
three floors i.e., First floor total area covered XXX.XX Mtr. Sq. consisting of
one drawing room, two bed rooms and one Kitchen, Second Floor total area
covered XXX.XX Mtr. Sq. two balcony, three bed room, one drawing room, one
dining room and one kitchen and third floor total area covered XXX.XX Mtr. Sq.
the total area of the said property is XXX.XX Mtr. Sq. from the XXXXXX S/o XXXXXXXXX
R/o Graam XXXXXX, Delhi-XXXXXX as first owner of the said property against the
consideration of Rs. XX,00,000/-(XXXXX Lakhs Only) and the same was registered
vide Bhai No. X, Jild No. XXXX, page No. XXX/XXX, Serial N.-XXXXX on XX.XX.XXXX.
The copy Property documents with site plan are annexed here as annexure P-1 (colly).
5.
That on XX-XX-XXXX, the complainant sold second floor with roof rights of
the property bearing number-plot no. XXX, XXXXXXXX, Uttar Pradesh- XXXXXX to
Sh. XXXXXXXX S/o XXXX R/o X-XX XXX, Delhi-XXXXXX vide registration number i.e Vahi
No. X, Jild No. XXXX, page No. X to XX, Serial No.-XXXXX on XX.XX.XXXX. The
copy Registry of XXXXXXXX is annexed here as Annexure
P-2.
6. That on XX.XX.XXXX, Sh. XXXXXXXXX told
the husband of complainant that fraud committed by imposter X and hence the
present complaint is filed by the complainant against has filed the complainant
against the accused persons for committing an illegal act of forgery, im-personification
and fraud in order to sell a property which was never a property of imposter
per se.
7. That on XX-XX-XXXX, imposter of X by means
of false and fabricated documents of property bearing details plot no. X, second floor with roof rights, XXXXXXXXX,
Uttar Pradesh-XXXXXX sold to one XX (accused no.02) against the consideration amount
of Rs. XX,00,000/-(XXXXXX lakhs only) and the payments were made i.e., the
first payment of Rs. X,00,000/-(XXXX lakhs only) through RTGS number XXXXXXXXX
on XX-XX-XXXX, second payment of Rs. X,XX,000/-(XXX lakh XXXXXX thousand only)
through RTGS number XXXXXXXXXX on XX-XX-XXXX, Third payment of Rs. X,XX,000
through RTGS number XXXXXXXXXX on XX-XX-XXXX, Fourth instalment of Rs. X,00,000/-(XXXX
lakh only) through RTGS number XXXXXXXXXX on XX-XX-XXXX, Fifth payment of Rs.
XX,XX,000/-(XXXXXXX lakhs XXXXXX thousand only) through RTGS number XXXXXXXXXX
on XX-XX-XXXX and Final payment of Rs. XX,00,000/-(XXXXX lakhs only) through DD
number XXXXX of XXXXXXXXX bank on XX-XX-XXXX. The accused no.02 take a loan
against the above-mentioned property from the accused no.3 (XXXXXXX Bank
BO-XXXXXXXXX, New Delhi-XXXXXX) of Rs.
XX,00,000/- (XXXXX lakhs).
8. That the accused no.3 sanctioned the loan against
the property bearing number- plot no. XXX, second floor with roof rights, XXXXXXXXXX,
Uttar Pradesh- XXXXXX i.e., Second Floor total area covered XXX.XX Mtr. Sq. two
balcony, three bed room, one drawing room, one dining room and one kitchen. The
accused no.3 without examine the complete chain of documents and without
verifying the actual physical possession of the property. The official of
accused no.3 did not see the mandatory guidelines for sanctioning the loan and
also not follow the required should must examine minimum XX years chain and
conveyance deed with proper identity card of the previous owners of the
property but in same was not done in connivance with each other, the accused
no.3 dose not examine the documents before sanctioning the loan amount of Rs.
XX,00,000/-(XXXXXXX lakhs only).
9.
That the witness i.e.,
accused no.4 and 5 namely XXXX and XXXXX are also the part of conspiracy and
signed the documents even after knowing the fact that the lady, who has sold
the property was not X and yet they signed as witnesses, which made the
complainant believed that they were also a part of the entire conspiracy and
cheating.
10. That
at the time of sale deed execution the officials of registrar officials have to
strictly adhered to examine the property documents along with id proof of the
seller and the purchaser but the officials of registrar office did not match the
id proofs and the property documents before registry of the said property which
certainly shows connivance on the part of the official from the registrar
office (accused no.7).
11. That the above said act the accused has committed
the offence of civil as well Criminal Act complaint under section 205, 378,
379, 415, 416, 417, 419, 420, 406, 463, 464, 470, 471, 34 of Indian Penal Code,
1860 and under section 66C of information Technology Act, 2000.
12. That the accused
persons have committed grave illegal act of selling property by committing various
punishable acts under various sections it should be put behind the
Bars.
13. That the offences
i.e., false representation, theft, cheating by impersonation, forgery, criminal breach of
trust, making false documents, forged documents, common
intention fraudulently using the ID proofs and
signature all are cognizable in nature
and punishable under IPC and IT Act.
These offences can be investigated by your good-self and your
good-self have the jurisdiction to enquire/investigate this
complaint.
14. That the above
mentioned persons cheated the complainant by way
of using her name, id's, identity and tried to falsely implicate the
complainant in a false and frivolous criminal case and it is also important to
mention here that this is such a serious nature of criminal case, where so many persons are running a syndicate to cheat the innocent persons and in this syndicate, officials of bank are part and parcel otherwise,
the same kind of crime could
not take place and it is important to mention
here that the officials of the Registrar
office is also the part & parcel of the same gang and they were the persons, who were having
all the information of the property deals and having
full control of the sale deeds and this kind of crime could not
possible without the collusion of officials of Registrar office.
15. That this complaint case
may be treated as very serious in nature since so many crimes could have committed by
them and the accused persons must have been planning to do
more than they have done in the past.
16. That the difference
between the real X and the imposter of X can be seen with naked eyes since
there so much of age difference and signature
mismatched from the original and the forged signatures and other
differences also be seen but all these things were ignored for
cheating only by the officials from the XXXXXXXXX bank and the
officials of Registrar office.
17. That
on XX-XX-XXXX, the complainant
already sent the complaint to the Senior Superintendent of police, Distt: XXXXX,
The Superintendent of Police Distt: XXXXXXX and the D.S.P of XXXXXXXXXXXX through
emails but no action had taken by the officials on the complaint filed by the
complainant. The copy of screen shots of emails are annexed here with as
Annexure-P-4.
18. That
on XX-XX-XXXX the complainant again
sent the complaint to the Senior Superintendent of police, Distt: XXXXXXXX, The
Superintendent of Police Distt: XXXXXXXX and the D.S.P of XXXXXXXXXX and on XX-XX-XXXX and printouts of screen
shots of emails send to the concern police officials are enclosed with this
complaint case but no action had taken by the officials. The copy of screenshots
of emails and it is also important to mention here the same complaint sent to
SHO, and the higher police officials of Ghaziabad through speed post and postal
receipts are annexed herewith as Annexure-P-5(colly).
19. That feeling aggrieved of this the complainant sent
the copy of the complaint through speed post and emails, which he had filed before
P.S:-XXXXXXXXXX, Uttar Pradesh office to take proper action and direct the
police officials of XXXXXXXXXXXXX
Police Station to register the complaint and investigate the matter but till
now no action has been taken on the complaint of the complainant. The
Copies Of The Complaint To Ps: XXXXXXX, Ghaziabad and S.S.P and D.S.P. The copy
of police complaint to the concerned police station are annexed here as annexure-P-4.
20. That
it is pertinent to submit that the Complainant has undergone huge loss by the
criminal acts of the accused persons. That it is further submitted that accused
persons has deliberately /intentionally/malafidely done criminal act under Sections
205, 378, 379, 415, 416, 417, 419, 420, 406, 463, 464, 470, 471, 34 of Indian
Penal Code, 1860 and under section 66C of Information Technology Act, 2000.
21. That
being aggrieved from the acts of the accused persons and no action taken by the
police officials on the complaint, the complainant is left with no option but
to approach before this Hon’ble Court with the present complaint against the
accused persons.
22. That the complainant in view of the averment made in
the complaint has disclosed the commission of the cognizable offence and has
made out a prima-facie very strong and apparent case for issuing directions to
the Commissioner of Police of Police Station XXXXXXXXX to register the F.I.R under the said
sections.
23. That
the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India has specifically laid down in numerous cases
that police can investigate any Cognizable Offence even without registration of
FIR, Madhubala Vs. Suresh Kumar 1997 (3)
Crimes 162 (SC), Suresh Chand Jain Versus State of Madhya Pradesh 2001 IAD (SC)
109.
24. That
it is needless to say that the case of the Complainant pertains to both
cognizable and non-cognizable offence, which requires for the police to
investigate into the matter and bring the Complainant to justice.
25. That
it is a settled law that the police have to register the FIR and cause an
investigation in a case which pertains to the commission of a non-cognizable
offence.
26. That
after having got the complaint received in the Police Station, the complainant
requested the police officials to lodge the FIR against the accused persons but
it was of no use as no action was taken by the concerned police officials,
though they are duty bound to do so as per the most recent judgment of Supreme Court in Lallan Bhai & Ors. V/s
State of Bihar & Anr. SC 2006 (3) JCC 1731, and also in the landmark
judgments of Ramesh Kumari Vs. State
(N.C.T. of Delhi) & Ors. 2006 I
AD (Cr.) SC 505 and State of Haryana
and Others Vs. Bhajan Lal and Others, 1992
Supp (1) SCC 335.
27. That
as the accused has committed the offences of cheating, forgery, fraud,
,criminal breach of trust, misappropriation of property etc. thus the offences
involving mens rea (guilty intention), it is required to lead the evidences
showing the dishonest intention of the accused and in the cases like this, in
order to secure summoning /conviction by this Hon’ble Court, it is essential
that the evidence showing dishonest intention must be led before this Hon’ble
Court and which is possible only through investigation by the police authorities.
28. The
complainant has no means to investigate into the matter and / cause a scrutiny
to be made of the records for the purpose of trial unless and until this
Hon’ble Court directs the police to investigate into the matter and apprehends
the accused and the relevant documents.
29. That
for the purpose of saving valuable time of this Hon’ble Court it is expedient
in the interest of justice kindly issue direction to the Commissioner of Police
at Police Station XXXXXXXXXX to register F.I.R in the Sections 205, 378, 379,
415, 416, 417, 419, 420, 406, 463, 464, 470, 471, 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860
and under section 66c of Information Technology Act, 2000.
30. That
the Complainant is further under the constant threat of false and misleading
criminal prosecution against him which would render him helpless and cause
irreparable injury to the Complainant.
31. That
if the Accused persons is not caught, there is a plausible possibility that the
aforementioned Accused persons would continue with their criminal activities
and would cause harm and injury to the complainant.
P
R A Y E R
It
is therefore most humbly prayed in view of the facts and circumstances of the
case, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to
a.
Direct the Commissioner
of Police of Police station XXXXXXXXX to immediately register FIR against the
accused persons under Sections 205, 378, 379, 415, 416, 417, 419, 420, 406,
463, 464, 470, 471, 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and under section 66c of
Information Technology Act, 2000 and under any more relevant sections and to
investigate the matter further and to submit their final report in this regard,
in the interest of justice.
b.
Pass such further order
or orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper of the facts and
circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice.
Ghaziabad Complainant
Dated Through,
Counsel
XXXXXXXXXXXXX & ASSOCIATES
Office
no. X, XXXXXXXX,
Delhi-XXXXXX, Mob. XXXXXXXXXX
Email- xxxxxxxxxxxx@yahoo.in
IN THE COURT OF LD.
CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, GHAZIABAD COURTS, UTTAR PRADESH
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT No.
______ OF XXXX
IN THE MATTER OF: -
Smt. XXXXXXXXX … Complainant
Versus
Smt. XXXXXXXXX & ors. … Accuseds
AFFIDAVIT
I, Smt. X W/o XXXXXXXXX, permanent
residents of X/XXX XXXXXXXXXXXX Delhi-XXXXXX
carrying Adhaar card no. XXXXXXXXXXXXX is the
deponent, do hereby solemnly affirm and declare as under:-
1.
That I, deponent is the Complainant in the
accompanying complaint U/s 156(3) of Cr.P.C filed by the deponent and being
conversant with the facts and circumstances of the case, I am competent to
swear this affidavit and the details provided in the present application U/s 156(3)
Cr.P.C has been entered into by deponent at my instructions. I have read the
contents of application and understood by me in vernacular.
2.
That the reliefs claimed in the application
are urgent in as much as the complainant facing great hardship and has been
harassed by the defendant and the facts mentioned herein are true and correct
to the best of my knowledge and belief and nothing material has been concealed
there from.
Deponent
Verification:-
Verified at Ghaziabad on this
day of _______, XXXX that the
contents of the above affidavit are correct to the best of my knowledge
and belief and no part of it is false and nothing material has been concealed
there from.
Deponent