IN THE COURT OF LD. CHIEF
METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE,
TIS HAZARI COURTS,
DELHI
COMPLAINT NO ………/20XX
IN RE:-
XXXXXXXXXXX …. COMPLAINANT
Versus
XXXXXXXXXXXX …. RESPONDENT
P.S. XXXXX
I N D E X
Sr.
No. |
Particulars |
Pages |
1. |
Memo
of Parties |
|
2. |
Criminal
Complaint U/s 200 Cr.P.C read with section 190 of Cr.P.C for commission of
offences under section 499, 354, 500, 503, 509 of IPC 1860 for making/circulating false and
defamatory statements/allegations through mobile and electronic media against
the complainant by the above-named respondent |
|
3. |
List
of Witnesses |
|
4. |
List
of Documents |
|
5. |
Certificate
U/s 65-B of Indian Evidence Act |
|
6. |
Vakalatnama |
|
New Delhi: Complainant
Date: Through
Counsel
Address: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX MOB:-XXXXXXXXXX
Email-XXXXXXXXXXXX
IN THE COURT OF LD. CHIEF
METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE,
TIS HAZARI COURTS,
DELHI
COMPLAINT NO ………/20XX
IN RE:-
XXXXXXXXXXX .….
COMPLAINANT
Versus
XXXXXXXXXXX ….. RESPONDENT
MEMO OF PARTIES
XXXXXXXXXXXXX
W/oXXXXXXXXXX
R/o XXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXX ...COMPLAINANT
Versus
XXXXXXXXXXXXX
S/o XXXXXXXXXX
R/o XXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXX ...RESPONDENT
Delhi: Complainant
Date: Through
Counsel
Address:XXXXXXXXXX M.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Email-XXXXXXXXXXXXX
IN THE COURT OF LD. CHIEF
METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE,
TIS HAZARI COURTS,
DELHI
COMPLAINT NO ………/20XX
IN RE:-
XXXXXXXXXXX
…. COMPLAINANT
Versus
XXXXXXXXXXX
….. RESPONDENT
P.S:-XXXXXX
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT U/S 200 Cr.P.C READ WITH SECTION
190 OF CR.P.C. FOR COMMISSION OF OFFENCES U/S 354, 499, 500, 503, 509 IPC ALONG WITH
SECTION 34 & 35 OF IPC 1860 FOR MAKING/CIRCULATING FALSE AND DEFAMATORY
STATEMENTS/ALLEGATIONS THROUGH MOBILE AND ELECTRONIC MEDIA AGAINST COMPLAINANT
BY THE ABOVE-NAMED RESPONDENT
MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:-
1.That the Complainant is
the permanent resident of property bearing XXXXXXXX, and is a law-abiding citizen of India. It is further submitted that the complainant is the
wife of the accused. Copy of Adhar Card of complainant
is annexed as ANNEXURE C-1.
About Section of Complaint & Cause:-
2. That this Complaint is
filed under the authority of Section 200 read with Section 190 of the Criminal
Procedure Code, 1973. Further, this complaint is made for the purpose of
redressing the commission by the accused of “Criminal defamation” of the
Complainant in terms of Section 499 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 with
relation to the video made by the accused from his shop bearing 10-3596, XXXXXXX, Delhi with full of allegations
and the character assassination of complainant and threatening to the
Complainant that if she would not give him money, property share from the
property then accused would commit suicide and make responsible to complainant,
which was distributed and disseminated. This complaint seeks due and
just punishment to the accused in terms of Sections 499,354,500,503, 509 of the
Indian Penal Code, 1860.
Brief facts:
3. That the father namely XXXX & mother namely XXXX of accused lived at XXXXXXXXX XXXX from last more than XXXX years and father of accused died at XXXX, XXXXX and the mother of accused is alive & living at XXXXX, XXXX with her sons.
4.That it is important to mention here that the relation between XXXXX/father of accused & accused is not good from last several years and it is also important to mention here that the relations between the complainant & her son namely XXXX with the accused are not cordial relations from last several years and such a relationship turned out due to the atrocities of the accused upon complainant & her son and it is also important to mention here that the accused was/is a habitual drinker and the accused often creates an unlawful scene with the complainant. That the complainant further submits before this Hon’ble Court that the complainant & her son have been living peacefully and earning livelihood on their own and do not have any sort of relation with the accused at all.
5. That the accused and the complainant resides under the same roof and the accused along with the complainant are not in talking terms and even otherwise the Kitchen for both the complainant and the accused are separate and the same is not at all joint. The behavior of the accused is against the ethics as the accused is indulged in using abusive languages and in past also he raised his hand over the complainant & her son, and it is pertinent to note over herein that the said relationship of the accused was also similar with his parents and siblings and all the family members and it is also important to mention here that the accused is having one son & three daughters and no one in the family has talking terms with accused and the behavior of the accused is so bad towards the daughter of the accused that he tried to creates ruckus in the marriage of her youngest daughter and the accused was sent to rehabilitation centre on the day of the marriage of his daughter.
6. That the Complainant
submits that in and around XXXX, the accused threatened his father XXXXX about
the dire consequences in case if the father of the accused did not give the
accused’s share in the property, consequent to which, the father of the accused
in grief hurt, had openly announced in the family :-
“ME TUJHE EK PAISA NAHI DEKAR JAUNGA, TERE HISSE KA SARA KA SARA ME APNI BAHU AUR POTE KO DE JAUNGA AUR APNI BAHU AUR POTE KO BOL KAR JAUNGA KI TUJHE KUCH BHI NA DE NAHIN TO SAB KUCH SHARAB ME UDHA DEGA” and despite the said fact that the treatment of the complainant on the hand of the accused is absurd, unethical and that the life of the Complainant & her son is disturbed due to the various atrocities of the accused and the accused even otherwise, under the influence of the alcohol, have quarreled with the complainant & her son and have used abusive language in front of everyone.
7. That it is to be noted that the siblings of the accused are living separately from accused from last more than XX years and it is the accused, who fought with his parents& siblings and asked the share in the properties and when his father denied to do so then accused migrated from XXXXXXXX, Delhi & after some time, he opened a shop at XXXXX, Delhi and since then accused is living at Delhi with complainant, one son & three daughters and within the accused & complainant there is not a good frame of mind from couple of years due to the over excessive use of alcohol by accused and as a result of which, the accused had also been sent to the rehabilitation Centre couple of times in the last 4-5 years.
8.That accused father namely XXXXX (now deceased) had tried a lot to make the accused understand that drinking alcohol not a good habit and if the accused did not stop drinking then the father of the accused would disown the accused from all their movable and immovable properties but the behavior of the accused failed to mend his ways and still continued to put his bad behavior towards family members and his father.
9. That due to continuous bad & unlawful behavior of accused, the deceased father of the accused called him and conveyed that he was going to distribute all his movable and immovable properties in equal shares to both sons namely XXXX & XXXX and the son of accused XXXXX. It is further submitted that accused did not raise any query or objection and even the accused has given his consent for the same for distribution and accused father accordingly distributed his all movable & immovable properties equally in favour of XXXXX, XXXX (Son) and XXXXXXX) equally by way of WILL. Copy of WILL annexed as ANNEXURE C-2. Notice dated XXXXX was also published in the daily newspaper with regard to any objection with regard to WILL by Sub Registrar, XXXXXXXXXXXX, in XXXXX. Copy of Notice dated XXXXXX, published in newspaper by Sub Registrar, XXXXXXXXXX, in XXXXX is annexed as ANNEXURE C-3. It is pertinent to note that the said will was in knowledge of the accused and the accused never refuted to the said fact.
10. That it is significant to state here that in the year 20XX, accused consumed Mixture of XXX TABLET, as conveyed by him and accused was hospitalized to XXXXXXXX, but due to legal issues with the hospital and accused, the same thing was not disclosed by accused to the Govt. authorities and the same was conveyed to the family members only and after few days, he was discharged from the hospital and since then everyone in the family has fear to talked to accused as he was very much aggressive. Since the time of discharge from the hospital, a drastic change came to accused behavior that he increased the frequency to take the alcohol and because of the excess drinking habit, he had been sent to rehabilitation centers and even the father of the accused, who was concerned with the ill-behavior of the accused, died due to the acts of the accused on XXXXXXX.
11.That now it has been learnt that the accused is indulging himself in
excessive use of alcohol throughout the day and the abusiveness of the accused
towards the complainant have increased and he made video from his shop bearing
10-3596, XXXXXX, Delhi with full of allegations and the character assassination
of complainant and putting such worst allegations of extra marital
relations/illicit relations with other persons and threatening to the
complainant that if she will not give him money, property share from the
property then accused would commit suicide and make responsible to complainant
& all other family members and this video accused had sent to his brother
XXXX from his mobile number XXXXXXXXXX to his mobile number-XXXXXXXXXX on XXXX
by XX and the accused again sent the same threatening video to his younger
brother XXXXX from his mobile number XXXXXXXXX to his number XXXXXXXXX on XXXX
by XXX and accused sent the same objectionable video to his sister XXXX on XXXX
from his mobile number XXXXXXXXX to her mobile no. XXXXXXXXXX, and the same
video came into the knowledge of complainant and then everyone in the family
was surprised to listen the content of the video, circulated to some of the
relatives and giving threats to complainant to spread the video to all the
relatives and friends and started making false allegations against the
complainant and the accused has sent video leveling false allegations against
complainant and giving threats that he would commit suicide.
The statement/conversation/transcription of the
video, is as follows:
“SHRIMAN
SHO SAHIB THANA XXXXXXXXXXX MAIN XXXX BOL RAHA HU MAIN AAJ BAHUT ZYADA PARESHAN
CHAL RAHA HU ISKA KARAN YE HAI MERI PATNI XXXX KE GAIR SAMBANDH HAI XXXX 52
CHANDERLOK AUR XXXX BEHROR SE RAAT KO PEECHE KE DARWAZE SE AATE HAI AUR CHALE
JAATE HAIN MAIN BOLTA HUT OH APNE LADKE SE DHAUNS DETI HAI BULAUN USKO KARWAUN
SIDHA YA CHUP RAHEGA PITWATI HAI MEREKO MAIN DARR KI WAJAH SE CHUP REHTA HU KAI
BAAR MUJHE GHAR SE BAHAR NIKALWA CHUKI HAI ISKA KOI BHAROSA NAHI MEREKO GHAR MEIN
RAKHEGI YA NAHI, 4 BAAR MUJHE NASHA MUKTI KENDRA MEIN BAND KARWA CHUKI HAI 4
SAAL KE LIYE, WAHA MUJKO PITWATI THI KHANA NAHI DETE THE BAHUT ZYADA PARESHAN
KAR RAKHA THA MEREKO AUR DUSRA KAARAN YE HAI KI MERE BAAP DADA KI JO ZAYDAD HAI
USME MERE BHAI DONO MEREKO BEDAKHAL KAR RAHE HAIN XXXXXXXXX AND XXXXXXXX, MERI
PATNI KO DE RAHE HAIN, MERI PATNI KA KOI BHAROSA NAHI MUJHE KAB GHAR SE BAHAR
KAR DE ISILIYE MAIN APNA TEESRA HISSA CHAHTA HU, AUR MAIN SULFAZ KHA KE AATAM
HATYA KARUNGA USKE ZIMMEDAR XXXXXXXXX,XXXX MERI PATNI XXXX, MERA LADKA XXXXXXXXXX, XXXXXXXX
AUR XXXXXX HONGE. YE VIDEO MAIN INDIA TV DELHI POLICE COMMISSIONER, AUR APNE
SAMAJ KE LOGO KO BHEJUNGA TAKI MERE SATH INSAAF HO SAKE DHANYAWAD”
CD containing the video is
annexed as ANNEXURE C-4.
12. That when Complainant & her son
confronted the accused about the video, then accused started giving threats
that he would spread the video to public at large, relatives, media, police and
other social media platforms and destroy the reputation of the complainant, if
1/3rd share in all the movable and immovable properties not given to
accused. Whereas the truth is that with regard to the movable & immovable
properties of his father is already distributed among XXXXX (grandson), XXXX
(son) and XXXXX (son) equally as per the last his Will.
14. That it is crystal clear from the above
conversation of video that the accused is threatening to the complainant in
order to get the 1/3rd share of properties and he is also talking
about disown from property by complainant and brothers namely XXXX&XXXX,
which is clearly false and frivolous statement. But the fact is that due to the
bad and unlawful behaviors and activities of the accused, his father has already
severed his all kinds of relations and that is why, he had not given any share
in his immovable & movable properties and had already made WILL with
respect to his properties. It is pertinent to mention here that due to cruel
and evil-minded personality of the accused, mother of the accused has also
severed all the ties with him and she also executed a registered ‘Will” in
favour of Sh. XXXXXXX (grandson), XXXX (son) and XXXX (son). Copy of the
registered Will dated XXXXXXX is also executed herewith as ANNEXURE C-5.
15. That accused had already shown his
intentions in the above said conversation through video circulated that he is
not mentally & psychologically fit and, there is a possibility that accused
might took the step of committing suicide or circulate the objectionable video
to masses i.e relatives, friends, neighbours or in general public and if
accused circulate the same then it would be amount of reputation loss to the
complainant. Moreover, it is also
admitted fact that accused is alcoholic in nature and having the past of going
to Rehabilitation Centers for treatment. This clearly shows that accused is
having grudges against the complainant. That’s why complainant has registered a
complaint against the accused to SHO, P.S XXXXX, Delhi with regard to the said
act of the accused. The copy of the complaint has been annexed as ANNEXURE
C-6.
16. That accused is
creating hindrance, interference and disturbance to the complainant in
peacefully using and doing, with bad motives and having evil intention to grab all moveable and immoveable properties of
the complainant, for which accused is ready to use every hook and took
possibilities to harass the complainant.
Circulation of the video/jurisdiction:-
17. That the video made by the accused is circulated at various places
whatsapp. Further, the video is made from
his shop bearing 10-3596, XXXXXXXXX, Delhi, and the same circulated to
all from the same shop at XXXXXX, Delhi, which comes under the jurisdiction of
this Hon’ble Court and this Hon’ble Court has jurisdiction to entertain the
aforesaid complaint and to proceed therefrom.
18. That
“defamatory video” the act of making & circulating the “defamatory video”
in question, the accused is liable for the irreversible and unquantifiable
damage by making false, baseless, scandalous, malicious
content/statement/allegations against the complainant. The complainant further
submits that at this juncture it is very difficult to assess the exact loss
occurred to her, since complainant having worth lakhs of rupees and she
reserves the right to initiate other legal recourses i.e Civil & Criminal
cases against the accused in future.
19. That it is a settled law that every man has a right to
have his reputation to preserve inviolate. This right of reputation is
acknowledged as an inherent personal right of every person. It is “a jus in
rem”. So, if by the wrongful
act is found to be committed, the person who feels it is affecting his
reputation, it amounts to defamation for which he becomes entitled for damages.
Here it is pertinent to mention that the Right to Reputation has already been
recognized as fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution of India.
20. That the right to freedom of speech and
expression comes along with a duty and
responsibility of not abusing such freedom
in furtherance of its personal vendetta towards any particular
individual. In the present case, the facts stated herein above disclose that the present defamatory and vilification
circulation of video has been purposely done by the accused is being carried out with an ulterior motive to malign the
image & wrecking vengeance against the complainant.
21. That the accused corroded the reputation of
complainant by sending the video to relatives of complainant, relatives and
other platforms and complainant getting calls from all regarding explanation.
The employees, friends, well wisher of the complainant were shocked and
surprised to see the defamatory video, which is still available on the mobile
of relatives. Subsequently, the complainant as well as other family members
started receiving various calls from its relatives, friends inquiring about
‘defamatory video’ containing the defamatory content including defamatory
statements made about the complainant purely with an intention to lower the
impeccable reputation of the complainant in the eyes of the relatives, friends,
public at large, therefore being clearly defamatory and libellous. The said
defamatory contents of the video have a sole objective just to cause damage to
the reputation and goodwill of the complainant, which it had gained multi-fold
in last few years. The one of the landmark judgment, the apex court mentioned
the quote from the ‘Mahabharat’ to explain the importance of ‘Reputation’ in
man’s life.
In Kiran Bedi and Jinder Singh Vs. Committee of
Inquiry AIR 1989 SC 714 - it was held as under:
The following words of caution uttered by Lord of Arjun in Bhagwat Geeta
with regard to dishonour or loss of reputation may usually be quote:
“Akirtnchapi Bhutani Kathaishyanti teavyayam,
Sambhavitasya Chakirtir Maranadatirichyate”
(Men will recount thy perpetual dishonour,
and to one highly esteemed,
dishonour exceedeth death)
22. That the accused has made various
mischievous and malevolent contents/comments, which are false/concocted in
nature and defamatory against the accused. The accused has incorporated the
same in the impugned video and further used
unverified information going far beyond facts in the video. When the same has been communicated to friends, relatives,
it affected badly on the innocent minds of friends, relatives & public at
large, which was done by the accused to tarnish and malign the reputation of
the complainant as well as to destroy their reputation in the society.
23. That the
accused did all this to settle personal Vendetta with the complainant and more particularly to prejudicially affect the
goodwill of the complainant. It is pertinent to mention that accused hatched a plan to malign the reputation of the
complainant to enrich himself at the behest of the reputation of the
complainant.
24. That the actions of the accused amount to
libel and slander. The accused sole intention behind making & circulation video
is to fulfill personal vendetta against the complainant.
25. That it is submitted that the accused has
failed to abide by the minimum moral standards
and there is a complete failure to comply with the ethical standards expected
from him. It is submitted that the accused is trying to garner excessive,
adverse and false publicity thereby injuring
the reputation of the complainant
and in such cases, the inherent power vests with this Hon'ble Court to interdict and restrain the accused from carrying
out such vilification campaign against the complainant.
26. That the defamatory video is still widely
available with relatives and friends and causing continuous malign the image,
damage to complainant. The accused has made himself liable to be prosecuted as
per the law.
27. That the complainant had no other speedy
and efficacious remedy at present against the accused and the accused repeated
denigration of the character of the complainant is plainly defamatory and
serves no public interest or for that matter has any legitimate connection with
public discourse and debate.
28. That it is therefore thoroughly derogatory
for the accused to do so and state their statements that have eroded the
well-earned reputation and character of the complainant.
29. The Complainant respectfully submits that
it is an utterly criminal act on the part of the accused to first make a video
containing false allegations and then circulates the same with a threat to
commit suicide. Such outrageous acts constitute the most daring acts of
criminal defamation. Accordingly, the accused are held fully responsible for
criminally defaming the good name and reputation of the complainant
30. As such, the accused has committed a
blatant act of defamation in respect of the Complainant’s name and character.
31. That the Complainant respectfully submits
that the accused through “defamatory video” making allegations and the character assassination of complainant and putting
such worst allegations of extra marital relations/illicit relations with other
persons and threatening to the complainant that if she would not give him
money, property share from the property then accused would commit suicide and
make responsible to complainant & all other family members is
ruthlessly destroying her reputation. The accused are therefore to be held
liable for their acts. Accordingly, their false statements have incalculably
injured the reputation of the Complainant.
32. By expressing false outrage at each turn,
the accused have most brutally damaged the reputation and character of the
Complainant.
33. The Complainant respectfully submits that
she is at a loss to identify the true meaning of the aforesaid statement.
Nevertheless, it suggests a derogatory reference to her.
34. That by making false and baseless
allegations for the Complainant on her character, the accused have committed a
grave defamation of the character and reputation of the Complainant. Therefore,
the accused has committed a severe defamation of the character and reputation
of the Complainant.
35. That the Complainant offers below, a
general argument on the non-applicability of the exceptions to Section 499 of
the Indian Penal Code, 1860:
36. That the Complainant respectfully submits
that the statements/allegations of the accused are far from true and even where
true, the statements are solely calculated to inflict injury upon the
reputation of the Complainant without aiming, on its face in any manner.
Further, the comments of the accused are far too extensive and intrusive and
the same done by accused to humiliate the Complainant and to render her an
object of contempt, ridicule. Similarly, knowingly, deliberately and
intentionally fabricating stories, inventing fictions and characters,
fabricating statements are acts of falsehood that cannot, by any stretch of
imagination, be considered to be in normal or good.
37. Actual harm upon the Complainant:
The Complainant respectfully submits, as already discussed in the above
mentioned XXXX, that her reputation has been gravely injured and harmed by the
accused and that every manner of grievance raised in this complaint against the
acts of the accused may be read as including a further grievance that those
acts were calculated to injure and harm the reputation of the Complainant and
that the same have indeed caused, actual injury and harm to the reputation of
the Complainant.
38. That as such, the accused is liable for
punishment under Section, 354, 499, 500, 503, 509 of the Indian Penal Code,
1860.
39. That the Complainant respectfully submits
that the video was filmed and circulated on XXXXXXXX. This Complaint has been
filed within the limitation before this Hon’ble Court. As such, this Complaint
is filed within time as reckoned for the purpose of Section 468 of the Criminal
Procedure Code, 1973.
40. That the requisite Court fees has been
affixed to file the present Complaint.
PRAYER
Therefore, in view of the circumstances most distressingly narrated above, the Complainant most humbly begs that this Hon’ble Court be graciously pleased to:
a) summon the accused to answer a charge of having collectively intended the commission of Criminal defamation of the Complainant in terms of Section 499 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and to;
b) summon the accused to answer a charge of collectively knowing or having reasons to believe that his act and imputation would harm the reputation of the Complainant and of causing actual harm to the reputation of the Complainant in terms of Section 499 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and to;
c) adjudge the accused as
guilty, whether by consent or upon trial, and to subject them, individually, to
the due and full punishment - in terms of Section 354, 500, 503, 509 of the
Indian Penal Code, 1860;
d)
pass any other order or
direction as may be desired or deemed expedient by this Hon’ble Court in the
interest of justice and expediency.
Place: Complainant
Date: Through
XXXXXXXXXXX
Counsel
Address. MOB:XXXXXXXXXX Email-XXXXXXXXXXXXX
IN THE COURT OF LD.
CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE,
TIS HAZARI COURTS,
DELHI
COMPLAINT NO ………/20xx
IN RE:-
SMT. XXXXXX ….. COMPLAINANT
Versus
SH. XXXXXXX …. RESPONDENT
P.S. xxxxxxxxxx
LIST OF WITNESS
Address MOB:XXXXXXXXXX
Email-XXXXXXXXXXXXX
IN THE COURT OF LD.
CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE,
TIS HAZARI COURTS,
DELHI
COMPLAINT NO ………/20xx
IN RE:-
SMT. XXXXXX ….. COMPLAINANT
Versus
SH. XXXXXXX …. RESPONDENT
P.S.XXXXXX
LIST OF DOCUMENTS
S
NO |
PARTICULARS |
PAGE
NO |
1. |
Annexure
C-1 Copy of Adhar Card of complainant |
|
2. |
Annexure
C-2 Copy of WILL of Late Sh. XXXXXXX |
|
3. |
Annexure
C-3 Copy of notice dated XXXXXXX published
in newspaper by Sub-Registrar, XXXXXXX |
|
4. |
Annexure
C-4 Original CD of the defamatory video. |
|
5. |
Annexure
C-5 Copy of registered WILL dated XXXXXX
of Smt. XXXXXXX |
|
6. |
Annexure
C-6 Copy of police complaint dated XXXXXXXX |
|
Place: Complainant
Date: Through
Counsel
MOB: XXXXXXXXXXXXX
Email-XXXXXXXXXXXXX
IN THE COURT OF LD.
CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE,
TIS HAZARI COURTS,
DELHI
COMPLAINT NO ………/20xx
IN RE:-
SMT. XXXXXX ….. COMPLAINANT
Versus
SH. XXXXXXX …. RESPONDENT
P.S. XXXXXX
CERTIFIACTE UNDER SECTION 65B OF INDIAN EVIDECNE ACT, 1872
1.
I, XXXXX W/o Sh. XXXXXX
R/o. XXXXX R/O XXXXXXXXXX.
2.
I say that the video
containing defamatory statements made by the accused is saved in my mobile and
& computer and the same was in my possession and print out taken from my
printer and the same is in my safe custody and as annexed in the petition
through CD.
3.
I say that the
computer, printer, mobile from which the videos were copied into CD was remains
in my custody, and I have lawful control over the same. The computer which was
used for copying the video into CD was at the relevant time operating properly
and nothing was observed so as to affect the electronic record or the accuracy
of its contents. The process of copying the video from the computer involves
retrieving the data thus, the data was copied directly from the mobile and the
only human intervention is giving the copying command.
4.
In the facts and
circumstances of the case, this Certificate be taken as sufficient compliance
of Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
IN THE COURT OF LD. CHIEF
METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE,
TIS HAZARI COURTS,
DELHI
COMPLAINT NO ………/20XX
IN RE:-
XXXXXXXXXXX ........COMPLAINANT
Versus
XXXXXXXXXXXX ….. RESPONDENT
AFFIDAVIT
I, XXXX W/o XXXX, Age about XXX years R/o XXXX, do hereby solemnly affirm and declare on path as under:-
1. That
I, deponent is the complainant in present complaint case.
2. That
being conversant with the facts and circumstances of the case, I am competent
to swear this affidavit and the details provided in the present complaint case
has been entered into by deponent/at my instructions. I, have read the contents
of complaint case and understood by me in vernacular.
3. That
the reliefs claimed in the complaint case are urgent in as much as the
complainant facing great hardship and has been harassed by the accused.
4. That
the facts mentioned herein are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and
belief and nothing material has been concealed there from.
Deponent
Verification:-
Verified at Delhi on this XXXXX
day of September, 20XX that the contents of the above affidavit are
correct to the best of my knowledge and belief and no part of it is false and
nothing material has been concealed there from.
Deponent