CROSS OF PROSECUTRIX:-
Q1.
Is the time of occurrence on
09.01.2015 as 4.00 pm as mentioned in FIR? Where from this time is mentioned as
the statement of the prosecutrix nowhere mentions the time?
Q2.
Please see complaint Ex……… and
state whether this complaint is written by you or by whom?
Q3.
Please state whether your father
is employed somewhere or is in business?
Q4.
Please state what your father has
been doing for the last seven years?
Q5.
Please state whether your mother
is employed somewhere or is in business?
Q6.
Please state what your mother has
been doing for the last seven years?
Q7.
By what mode of transport your
parents used to go to the Temple?
Q8.
In your statement under Section
164 CrPC you stated that your parents used to visit Prachin Big Hanuman Temple.
Please state whether they used to go once a month or twice a month or when?
Q9.
Please state whether they used to
go for a particular time of the day and if so what was that time?
Q10.
In your statement under Section
164 CrPC you stated that you knew everyone in Prachin Hanuman Temple. Who are
those you are referring to whom you knew?
Q11.
Since when you know them?
Q12.
How do you know them?
Q13.
Is it correct that in your
statement under Section 164 CrPC you have not stated at what point of time Xx asked
you to accompany to Xx.
Q14.
Is it also correct that your
statement under Section 164 CrPC you have not stated that your parents had gone
along with you to the temple on 09.01.2015.
Q15.
Please state whether you orally
remember the date of 09.01.2015 or you recorded it somewhere?
Q16.
I put it to you that you have
mentioned 09.01.2015 in your statements by your imagination and that no such
incident took place with you on 09.01.2015.
Q17.
Is it also correct that your
statement under Section 164 CrPC you have not stated as to from where and by
what mode you had reached the temple?
Q18.
How long you stayed in the temple
when you came back?
Q19.
Is it also correct that as per your
statement under Section 164 CrPC you did not question Xxabout what kind of goods
were required to be brought from Xx.
Q20.
Is it also correct that you have
not given the flat number of Xx in any of your statements?
Q21.
Please state which are the flats in
Xxs which abut each other?
Q22.
Is it correct that in your
statements you did not disclose how far away is Xx from the Prachin Temple?
Q23.
Is it also correct that you have
not stated in your statements as to by what mode of transport you reached Xx?
Q24.
Is it also correct that you have
not stated in your statements as to how much time it took you to reach Xx?
Q25.
Is it also correct that you have
not stated in your statements you have not stated as to how long you stayed at Xx?
Q26.
Is it also correct that you have
not stated in your statements you have not stated as to when you came back from
Xx to the Temple?
Q27.
I put it to you that no such
incident took place with you on 09.01.2015.
Q28.
I put it to you that you have
falsely stated that Xx told you to accompany him to bring some goods from Xx.
Q29.
I put it to you that you have
falsely stated that Xx told you to go inside the flat.
Q30.
I put it to you that you have
falsely stated that Xx forcefully did sexual intercourse with you.
Q31.
I put it to you that you have
falsely stated that you told Xx that you wanted to tell about this to your
mother.
Q32.
I put it to you that you have
falsely stated that on this Xx stated that “Ye Sab Mujhe Mar Denge”.
Q33.
I put it to you that you have
falsely stated that Xx also told you that in case you informed about this
anyone then your family can be put to harm.
Q34.
I put it to you that you have
falsely stated that Xx told you that he would put allegations on you.
Q35.
Is it correct that you have not
stated in your statement under Section 164 CrPC that at what time on returning
back, you informed Xx about the whole incident?
Q36.
I put it to you that you did not
meet Xx on 09.01.2015.
Q37.
I put it to you that you have
falsely stated that Mr. Xx also threatened you that he would kill your father
by Tantar Mantar or harm him physically.
Q38.
Is it correct that in your
statement under Section 164 CrPC that you have nowhere stated that on
09.01.2015 your parents were with you?
Q39.
Did you disclose the fact of
alleged sexual intercourse to your mother or your father? If so to whom, where
and at what time?
Q40.
(Please note that the mother in
her statements says that her daughter told her after the incident had taken
place three times)
Q41.
I put it to you that as no such
incident had taken place on 09.01.2015 with you, you did not state anything
about it to your parents on 09.01.2015 or at anytime thereafter.
Q42.
Is it also correct that your
statement under Section 164 CrPC you have no where stated as to what happened
after you met xx in the temple?
Q43.
In your statement under Section
164 CrPC you have stated that your mother took action when you disclosed the
whole thing to her. Please state when did you disclose the whole thing to your
mother?
Q44.
Please state what action your
mother took when you told her “the whole thing”?
Q45.
I put it to you that as nothing
had happened with you, you disclosed nothing to your mother?
Q46.
I put it to you that this case is
the handiwork of your mother.
Age of prosecutrix
Q47.
How old is your brother?
Q48.
You started going to Temple from
Feb. – Mar. 2-15 onwards.
Q49.
How many times a month you used
to go to the Temple.
Q50.
Your parents were never
interested in any Puja at the Temple.
Q51.
Your father used to stand outside
the Temple gate to make relation with people.
Q52.
Your mother would go to the house
of Mahant Ji and introduced you to his son xx, so that you befriend him.
Q53.
The purpose of your mother was
that you get married in their family.
Q54.
With the aforesaid end in view you
started going to Mahant Ji house along with your mother on Sunday from Feb. –
March. 2015 onwards and not for any Puja.
Q55.
You and xx started liking each
other.
Q56.
Your mother proposed to Mahant Ji
to marry you withxx as you andxx have very much started liking each other.
Q57.
That Mahant Ji and his family
were not averse to this proposal and you and your mother were told that since
you have not completed 18 years, Rokka / Sagai can be done and marry should
take place after you attain 18 years.
Q58.
At that time your parents stated
that although she is already 16 ½ years, they agreed with the proposal of
Mahant Ji that they would wait for the marriage for her to complete 18 years.
Q59.
Please show the photographs of
Sagai to her and get the photographs Exhibited.
Q60.
Thereafter, on 26.05.2015 the
Sagai ceremony between the prosecutrix and the accused took place in the
presence of the families of both the sides and relatives etc. at the residence
of the accused at Xx. At that time the father of the accused had also given
Gold Necklace weighing about 2 ½ tolas. All the expenses of the Sagai Ceremony
were borne by the father of the accused. The photographs annexed with this
application will go to show that the Sagai Ceremony had taken place between the
prosecutrix and the accused.
Q61.
That
the applicant / accused did not commit any rape with the prosecutrix. It is
sheer out of vengeance by the parents of the prosecutrix who prevailed upon
their daughter to make false statement regarding the applicant / accused and a
false complaint was made by the prosecutrix to falsely implicate the accused.
Q62.
I put
it to you that the accused and his family were not aware of the real intentions
and plans and scheming of the prosecutrix and her family.
Q63.
I put
it to you that after the Sagai ceremony the mother of the prosecutrix started
putting unreasonable demands upon the father of the accused i.e. to transfer
the Xx in the name of the prosecutrix and also to purchase jewelry for her and
bear the marriage expenses from the side of the girl amounting to Rs.6-7 Lakhs.
Q64.
I put
it to you that the aforesaid demands came as a big shock to the accused and his
father.
Q65.
I put
it to you that accused no.2 inquired from your father about the business or
source of income.
Q66.
I put
it to you that your parents were unable to give any satisfactory answer.
Q67.
I put
it to you that your mother roped in the accused to blackmail the accused no.2 by
raising such high demands before marriage.
Q68.
I put it to you that your mother
had been repeatedly making demand for transferring the ownership of Xx in your
name before the marriage actually take place.
Q69.
I also put it to you that your
mother repeatedly stated to accused no.2 to bear all expenses of marriage
including the expenses incurred from your side.
Q70.
On being refused your father’s
demand, a false story of forcible sexual intercourse has been fabricated by
your parents and you have acted as a pawn in the hand your parents.
Q71.
That
on 14.04.2017 the Sagai of the elder brother of the accused took place. In view
of the shopping demands made by the parents of the prosecutrix, the father of
the accused did not invite the parents of the prosecutrix. On the same night
the parents of the prosecutrix came to the house of the accused and criminally
intimidated to see the family of the accused.
Sickness of Sakshi
Q72.
You said in the written complaint
that when this incident took place you became sick. Please state how long you
remained sick?
Q73.
Please state the nature of your
illness?
Q74.
Please state from whom you got treatment?
Q75.
Please state whether you gave any
treatment papers to your school?
Q76.
Please state whether you gave
treatment paper to IO?
Q77.
Suggestion to you is that you
have made a false statement regarding your sickness.
Q78.
You have falsely stated that you
to fear your mother took out of the school.
Q79.
You have falsely stated that you
have been threatened and that you have been receiving telephone calls of
threat.
Q80.
Comparative Chart of Statements
of the Prosecutrix
|
Written Complaint Dated 15.04.2017 |
Statement U/s 161 CrPC Dated 15.04.2017 |
Statement U/s 164 CrPC Dated 18.04.2017 |
Statement before NGO 15.04.2017 |
Statement before Doctor 15.04.2017 |
|
There
is overwriting of the date from 14.04.2017 to 15.04.2017 and it is signed by Xx. Suggestion
to the witness is that she simply signed the written complaint which is untrue
and false and has been made only at the behest of her mother. The
next suggestion is that no such incident of forcibly intercourse ever took
place between her and xx xx .
Date of Birth 30.06.2001 Date
of Birth is based on the transfer certificate. Suggestion to the witness is that her age
was more than 16 years on the alleged date of 09.01.2015. |
Nil |
1.
15 years 10 months by IO ASI Xx while
identifying prosecutrix 2.
15 years as disclosed before Ld. M.M. |
16 years |
16 years |
|
Complaint in the handwriting of Xx, but
signed by Xx as well as by Xx. It
shows that her mother has prevailed over her and the complaint is drafted
handwritten by the mother. Suggestion to the witness that this is
not her complaint but at the behest of her mother. |
|
|
|
|
|
Incident of 09.01.2015 She
does not say that 09.01.2015 she had gone to the Temple along with her
parents. |
I
went to the Temple along with my parents. My
parents were doing Puja whenxx asked
me to go along with him for bringing some goods. Please
state what Puja your parents used to perform? That
your father never performed any Puja but used to stand outside the gate and meet
people to make contacts? That
your father was told not to come there and disturbed the other devotees? That
your mother would only sit for 15-30 minutes and leave? That
the purpose of your parents taking you to the temple was to befriend and
friendly relation withxx? |
Incident of 09.01.2015 She does not
say that 09.01.2015 she had gone to the Temple along with her parents. |
No date
of forcibly intercourse given. That
she had gone with the parents to the Temple is not disclosed. |
That
she had gone with the parents to the Temple is not disclosed. No
date of forcibly intercourse given, but it is mentioned that forcibly
intercourse was done four times in January, 2015. |
|
Time of alleged incident on 09.01.2015. Not
stated |
Not
stated |
Not
stated |
Not
stated |
Not
stated |
|
How long you stayed in the flat. Not
stated. |
Not
stated |
Not
stated |
Not
stated |
Not
stated |
|
What time you left Temple. Not
stated |
Not
stated |
Not
stated |
Not
stated |
Not
stated |
|
What time you came back to the Temple. Not
stated |
Not
stated |
Not
stated |
Not
stated |
Not
stated |
|
When did you disclose the incident to
your parents for the first time? One
day I disclosed this to my mummy. |
Not
stated |
Not
stated |
Not
stated |
Not
stated |
|
Number of times forcible sexual
intercourse. 1.
09.01.2015 2.
Next week thereafter. |
1.
09.01.2015 2.
3-4 times without disclosing dates. |
1.
09.01.2015 2.
Thereafter two times without disclosing
dates.
|
Three
times without disclosing any dates. |
Four
times in Jan. 2015. |
|
Threat Threat
byxx on 09.01.2015.
Threat
by Mahant Ji on 09.01.2015 |
No
threat except that they don’t tell about it to anyone.
Informed
toxx’s father but no date given. |
Threat
byxx on 09.01.2015.
Threat
by Mahant Ji on 09.01.2015. Threat
again by Mahant Ji at the police station when they came along with 40-50
people. |
|
|
|
Threat by telephone calls. First
action by the mother. One
day my mummy telephoned Mahant Ji. |
Threat
by telephone calls. |
|
|
|
|
Running around at the house of Mahant Ji
for 6 months by my mummy. |
Nil |
Nil |
Nil |
Nil |
|
Forcible sexual intercourse. 1.
No detail of the same. 2.
It means it is a made up statement. 3.
The group of four flats are in close
proximity of each other. 4.
Nobody can enter the flat without being
noticed by neighbors of atleast the three flats out of group of four flats. 5.
It is a crowded complex. Without being
noticed from the gate till reaching of the flat one cannot enter the flat. 6.
It is correct that you have not given the
description of what happened inside the flat. 7.
It is because no such incident of
forcible sexual intercourse took place with you in the said flat. |
No
detail of the same. |
No
detail of the same. |
No
detail of the same. |
No
detail of the same. |
|
Plea of alibi On
09.01.2015 you were not with xx at all. On
09.01.2015 x was not in the Temple. |
|
|
|
|
Should
the victim be referred as the child witness.
Should
the victim be given the assistance of a women advocate and of a support person
if her age on the date of statement / deposition is more than 18 years.
Fresh questions:-
Q1.
How many times your statement was
recorded?
Q2.
Who all recorded your statements?
Q3.
Did you give any statement to the
counselor?
Q4.
Did you give any statement to the
doctor?
Q5.
Did you give any statement to the
police?
Q6.
I put it to you that in none of
the statements you have stated that you along with family visited the temple for
the last around seven years.
Q7.
What was your age when you went
to the temple for the first time?
Q8.
I put it to you that you never
visited the temple before March, 2015.
Q9.
Please state how many times in a
month you used to go to the temple?
Q10.
Please state whether there were
particulars days of the week when you used to go to the temple?
Q11.
Please state whether there were any
particular timings when you used to visit the temple?
Q12.
Please state what were your school
timings?
Q13.
Please state what you used to do on
reaching the temple?
Q14.
Please state for how long you
used to remain in the temple?
Q15.
Please state how you used to go
and you and your parents used to go from your house to the temple- bus, metro,
tempo, auto or any other mode?
Q16.
How many people used to be there
in the temple when you would visit along with your parents?
Q17.
Can you describe the place inside
the temple i.e. sitting place for the devotees and Gaddi of the mahant/ pujari?
Q18.
How many devotees can sit in the
temple?
Q19.
I put it to you that not less
than 125-150 people / devotees used to be invariably there during Satsang.
Q20.
Is it correct that you also used
to sit in Satsang as one of the devotees?
Q21.
Please state who used to perform puja
and other rituals in the temple?
Q22.
Is it correct that the mahant i.e.
accused no.2 used to sit and give blessings to the devotees?
Q23.
I put it to you that on
09.01.2015 accused Xx had not gone to the temple at all.
Q24.
I put it to you that you did not
meet Xxat the temple on 09.01.2015.
Q25.
I put it to you that Xx was doing
job with ……….. and had left his house in the morning and came back in the
evening around …… after attending to his job.
Q26.
I put it to you that you have falsely
stated that on 09.01.2015 you met accused xx.
Q27.
I put it to you that you have
falsely stated that accused on 09.01.2015 accused xx told you to accompany him
at the flat situated at Xx on the pretext that he wanted to bring certain
articles there.
Q28.
I put it to you that you have
falsely stated that the accused took you to the flat at Xx.
Q29.
Is it also correct that you have
not given the flat number of Xx in any of your statements?
Q30.
Please state which are the flats
in Xxs which abut each other?
Q31.
Is it correct that in your
statements you did not disclose how far away is Xx from the Prachin Temple?
Q32.
Is it also correct that you have
not stated in your statements as to by what mode of transport you reached Xx?
Q33.
Is it also correct that you have
not stated in your statements as to how much time it took you to reach Xx?
Q34.
Is it also correct that you have
not stated in your statements you have not stated as to how long you stayed at Xx?
Q35.
Is it also correct that you have
not stated in your statements you have not stated as to when you came back from
Xx to the Temple?
Q36.
I put it to you that no such
incident took place with you on 09.01.2015.
Q37.
I put it to you that you have
falsely stated that Xx told you to go inside the flat.
Q38.
I put it to you that you have
falsely stated that Xx forcefully did sexual intercourse with you.
Q39.
I put it to you that you have
falsely stated that you told Xx that you wanted to tell about this to your
mother.
Q40.
I put it to you that you have
falsely stated that on this Xx stated that “Ye Sab Mujhe Mar Denge”.
Q41.
I put it to you that you have
falsely stated that Xx also told you that in case you informed about this
anyone then your family can be put to harm.
Q42.
I put it to you that you have
falsely stated that Xx told you that he would put allegations on you.
Q43.
Is it correct that earlier you
never told anyone or even in your statements that “after entering into the flat,
he took me upstairs where there was darkness and a huge bed was lying.
Thereafter he started searching some articles from the bed. Thereafter accused
xx push me on the bed and removed my clothes as well as his clothes”? Confronted
with portion A to A of her statement in the examination in chief. Also
confronted with the statement under Section 161 CrPC and other two statements
made before NGO Counselor and the doctor where it is not recorded.
Q44.
Is it also correct that earlier
you never told anyone or even in your statements that “the accused forcibly
inserted his penis into my vagina. As a result thereof, my vagina started
bleeding”? Confronted with portion B to B of her statement in the examination
in chief. Also confronted with the statement under Section 161 CrPC and other
two statements made before NGO Counselor and the doctor where it is not
recorded.
Q45.
Is it also correct that in your
written complaint Ex……… you did not state that “accused xx dropped me at the
temple and thereafter I complained about act of the accused to his father accused
Xx. On this Xx kept his hand on my shoulder and assured that nothing would
happen and further threatened me that in case I report the matter to anyone, he
would harm my father by Tantra Mantra. Then I returned back to home”?
Confronted with written statement Ex…… where the portion C to C is not so
recorded. Also confronted with the statement under Section 161 CrPC and other
two statements made before NGO Counselor and the doctor where it is not
recorded.
Q46.
I put it to you that you did not state
the confronted portions earlier to anyone as no such incident took place on
09.01.2015.
Q47.
I put it to you that after one
week thereafter also you did not go to the temple.
Q48.
I put it to you that even accused
Xx was at his job and not present in the temple on 16.01.2015.
Q49.
I put it to you that you have
falsely stated that after one week of the above incident you had gone to the
temple along with your parents.
Q50.
I put it to you that you have falsely
stated that accused xx had again taken you to the flat at Xx on the pretext of
conversion.
Q51.
I put it to you that you have
falsely stated that the accused xx again made physical relation with you.
Q52.
Is it correct that earlier
nowhere in any previous statement you stated that “accused made physical
relation with me by removing my clothes and his clothes and inserting his penis
into my vagina. Thereafter I started crying and told the accused that I will
report about the act of the accused to my parents. On this, accused again
threatened me. I was around 13 years old that time I got frightened and I was
apprehending accused and his father would do some Tantra Mantra on my family.
After above incident, accused dropped me outside the temple at one Gali thereafter
I went to my home”? Confronted with portion D to D of her statement in the
examination in chief. Also confronted with the statement under Section 161 CrPC
and other two statements made before NGO Counselor and the doctor where it is
not recorded.
Q53.
I put it to you that the accused
persons never threatened you to cause harm to your family by tantra mantra.
Q54.
I put it to you that accused xx never
had any sexual relation with you.
Q55.
I put it to you that you have
falsely stated that two years back the accused made physical relation with you.
Q56.
I put it to you that nowhere in
your earlier statement you have stated that “but third time, accused xxx again
took me to his flat at Xx on the pretext that he wanted to finish all the
matter with me. There again accused made physical relation with me after
removing my clothes as well as his clothes and forcibly inserted his penis into
my vagina. From there accused xx dropped me at the temple and thereafter, I
returned my home with my parents. Both the accused used to make called to me
and threatened me of dire consequences”. Confronted with portion E to E of her
statement in the examination in chief. Also confronted with the statement under
Section 161 CrPC and other two statements made before NGO Counselor and the doctor
where it is not recorded.
Q57.
I also put it to you that nowhere
in your earlier statement you have stated that “Accused Xx had also visited my
home and there in the absence of my parents, he used to ask me not to disclose
anything to anyone about the above incident. Sometimes, he also used to lay his
hand on my shoulder and waist and used to leave me upon return of my mother
from kitchen”. Confronted with portion F to F of her statement in the
examination in chief. Also confronted with the statement under Section 161 CrPC
and other two statements made before NGO Counselor and the doctor where it is
not recorded.
Q58.
I also put it to you that nowhere
in your earlier statement you have stated that “on 23.05.2015, I told about the
above incident to my mother. On 24.05.2015, I along with my parents had gone at
police station”. Confronted with portion H to H of her statement in the
examination in chief. Also confronted with the statement under Section 161 CrPC
and other two statements made before NGO Counselor and the doctor where it is
not recorded.
PW3 Father of child victim aged 18 years
On SA
The child victim is my daughter.
Since last 7-8 years, I along with my wife and the child victim used to visit
at Pracheen Hanuman Mandir at xx . Accused Xx Kumar Sharma, present in this
court today, is the Mahant of the above said Mandir. Accused Xx present in the
Court today, is the son of accused Xx Kumar Sharma. In Mandir I along with my
wife used to do the Seva Work. I do not remember the exact time, however,
accused 2 ½ - 3 years back my wife had told me that accused Xx had taken my
daughter at the flat situated at xx, Delhi and had established physical relations
with her. In the next morning I had confronted accused Xx about the act of his
son but he did not respond properly. Finding no response from the accused, I
along with my family had to go to the police station, xx . At the police
station, the accused persons came along with 40-50 persons. At the police
station, my wife had asked me to go prepared an affidavit on stamp paper
regarding the occurrence of the incident. Accordingly, I along with Xx who is
elder son of accused Xx had gone to prepare an affidavit. The affidavit is
already exhibited as Ex.PW1/A. After the execution of the affidavit I had fainted
at the police station for some time.
The
accused Xx had assured marriage of my daughter with his son accusedxx and
proposed for Roka ceremony. I do not remember the date. However, I along with
my family had gone at the house of accused for Roka ceremony. There some formalities
were done by the accused persons. Second wife of the accused and around three
persons working as Sawadar in the Mandir, had attended the Roka ceremony from
the side of accused. After that I continuously visited the accused Xx but he
avoided to have talks about the marriage on some occasions I was also
threatened at dire consequences, when all finally relized not we have been cheated
by the accused persons. The matter was reported to the police. The case was
registered on the complainant of my daughter.
xxxxxx
deferred at the request of the proxy counsel for the accused persons.
RO
& AC
xx
ASJ-01/ xx/ND
Q1. What is your occupation?
Q2. I put it to you that you are not doing any fruitful
work.
Q3. I put it to you that your wife runs the
house.
Q4. Can you tell when you went to the police
station?
Q5. It is correct that the affidavit was not
given to the police?
Q6. It
is wrong to suggest that I did not go the police station at all and that is why
I did not give affidavit to the police?
Q7. It
is wrong to suggest that Xx never accompanied you for making any affidavit?
Q8. It
is wrong to suggest that I never got prepared the affidavit.
Q9. It
is wrong to suggest that a false affidavit Ex.PW1/A was created afterwards in
2017?
Q10. It
is wrong to suggest that you have falsely stated that accused xx had
established physical relation with your daughter?
Q11. It
is wrong to suggest that because I and my wife were known to accused Xx for the
last many years that on the suggestion of your wife Xx agreed to get his son xx
married to your daughter.
Q12. It
is wrong to suggest that for this reason only the Roka ceremony was performed.
Q13. It
is wrong to suggest that I and my wife became greedy and raised demand that all
the marriage expenses of Rs.6-7 Lakhs should be borne by Xx Sharma only.
Q14. It
is wrong to suggest that I and my wife also put pressure on Xx Sharma to transfer
Xx in the name of my daughter after her marriage.
Q15. It
is wrong to suggest that I and my wife became very greedy and on the refusal of
Xx xx to meet our demands, Xxxx refused to marry his son accusedxx with my
daughter.
Q16. Is
it correct that the Sagai ceremony of the elder brother of accused xx was
performed on 14.04.2017?
Q17. It
is wrong to suggest that we were annoyed with the family of the accused Xx as
they had not invited us in the Sagai ceremony on 14.04.2017?
Q18. It
is wrong to suggest that a quarrel took place on 14.04.2017 between your family
and the family of the accused Xx?
Q19. It
is wrong to suggest that the present FIR case has been registered at instance
of my wife as we wanted to take the revenge for breaking the marriage alliance
daughter with xx by Xx xx?
Q20. It
is wrong to suggest that I have connived with my wife and got the accused
persons falsely implicated in this case by exploiting our daughter.
CROSS TO IO:-
1.
Did you receive the complaint
from the complainant or the same was marked to you by SHO?
2.
At what time the SHO marked the
written complaint to you?
3.
Is it correct that the accused
never disclosed to you that he had taken the victim girl to Flat No.62B, Mangla
Puri, and had sexual intercourse with her?
4.
It is wrong to suggest that I
have incorrectly prepared pointing out memo Ex……….
5.
It is wrong to suggest that the
accused did not point out any place of occurrence.
6.
I put it to you that the accused
had specifically disclosed to you that he had not met the victim on 09.01.2015 as
he was away to his Job from morning till late evening.
7.
It is wrong to suggest that the accused
disclosed to me that he had not met the victim on 09.01.2015 as he was away to
his Job from morning till late evening.
8.
It is wrong to suggest that the
accused persons have been falsely implicated.