LIST OF DATES & EVENTS
____________ : The respondent
company is the company registered under the provision of Companies Act. The respondent
was formerly known as _________ Limited and the name was thereafter changed to __________
Limited and accordingly “Fresh Certificate of Incorporation consequent on
change of name was issued by the office of the Registrar of Companies, _________.
: The respondent
agreed to sanction the loan to the petitioner and further granted the
petitioner a personal / business loan for the sum of Rs.25 Lacs on certain
terms and conditions of the agreement and the petitioner agreed to repay the
said loan amount with interest thereupon in monthly installments.
: That due to
non advancement of the second installment of the loan to the petitioner, the
petitioner business suffered and the petitioner was faced with unexpected
losses the business of the petitioner was prepared with the business
commitments on the pretext of the complete loan amount.
________ : The petitioner
was served with the legal notice whereby the said agreement was terminated and
the lona amount was recalled by the respondent bank and even the Sole
Arbitrator letter whereby the respondent company has already initiated Ms. __________was
appointed to lead in the said arbitration matter.
__________ : The petitioner
replied to the letter dated ________ to the petitioner stating thereby the
objection towards the appointment of the Arbitrator coupled with the objections
qua the Seat of the Arbitration as each and every transaction qua the aforesaid
loan agreement was carried out within the jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court.
_________ : Second notice was
served upon the petitioner to appear in person or through attorney before the
Arbitrator appointed by the respondent Ms. ________ in ___.
__.__-6 : Hence, the present application.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
CRL. MISC. (MAIN) PETITION No. ______
OF 2016.
IN
THE MATTER OF :-
__________________ : PETITIONER
VERSUS
FIR
No. _________
U/S.:
406/420 IPC
P.S.: _________
I N D E X
|
S.
NO. |
PARTICULARS |
PAGES |
C.FEE |
|
1. |
Notice
of Motion. |
A - |
|
|
2. |
Urgent
Application. |
B - |
|
|
3. |
Memo
of Parties. |
C - |
|
|
4. |
List
of Dates & Events. |
|
|
|
5. |
Petition under Section 482 of
Cr.P.C. With affidavit. |
|
|
|
6. |
Annexure
P-1. Application for defreezing of the
bank accounts filed by the petitioner before Ld. Trial Court. |
|
|
|
7. |
Annexure
P-2. A true copy of FIR
No._________. |
|
|
|
8. |
Annexure
P-3. Copy
of the list of the Bank account and Copy of the letter from the Bank account. |
|
|
|
9. |
Annexure
P-4. A true copy of ordersheet of Ld.
Trial Court. |
|
|
|
10. |
Application under Section 482 of
the Cr.P.C. for exemption from filing certified copy. With affidavit. |
|
|
|
11. |
Vakaltnama. |
|
|
DELHI PETITIONER
THROUGH
DATED
_________
ADVOCATES
_____________,
New
Delhi-110013.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
CRL. MISC. (MAIN) PETITION No. ______
OF 2016.
IN
THE MATTER OF :-
__________________ : PETITIONER
VERSUS
FIR
No. _________
U/S.:
406/420 IPC
P.S.: _______
URGENT APPLICATION
To,
The Hon'ble Joint Registrar,
Hon’ble High Court of Delhi,
New Delhi.
Sir,
Will
you kindly treat the accompanying petition / application as urgent one in
accordance with the provision of as per the Delhi High Court rules and regulations
and orders.
The grounds of urgency are as set out
in the accompanying petition / application.
Kindly treat the accompanying
petition for defreezing of the bank account of the petitioner, in the interest
of justice.
DELHI PETITIONER
THROUGH
DATED
________________
ADVOCATES
_____________,
New Delhi-110013.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
CRL. MISC. (MAIN) PETITION No. ______
OF 2016.
IN
THE MATTER OF :-
__________________ : PETITIONER
VERSUS
FIR
No. _________
U/S.:
406/420 IPC
P.S.: _________
MEMO OF
PARTIES
Through
…………….
New Delhi. : PETITIONER
VERSUS
__________________________________ : RESPONDENTS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
DELHI PETITIONER
THROUGH
DATED
_________
ADVOCATES
_____________,
New
Delhi-110013.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
CRL. MISC. (MAIN) PETITION No. ______
OF 2016.
IN
THE MATTER OF :-
Through
…………….
New Delhi. : PETITIONER
VERSUS
FIR
No. _________
U/S.:
406/420 IPC
P.S.:
__________
PETITION FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE PETITIONER UNDER SECTION
482 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 1973 FOR DIRECTION TO THE BANK FOR DEFREEZING
OF THE BANK ACCOUNT OF THE PETITIONER IN THE FIR NO. _________ UNDER SECTION
406/420 OF IPC PENDING BEFORE THE LD. TRIAL COURT OF SH. S.K. ARORA; LD. CMM,
SAKET COURT, NEW DELHI.
To,
The
Hon’ble the Chief Justice and his Hon’ble Companion Judges of the High Court of
Delhi at New Delhi.
MAY IT PLEASE YOUR LORDSHIPS :-
1. That the
Petitioner is law abiding citizen and has full faith in the administration of
justice. That the
Petitioner has sought to invoke the Extraordinary jurisdiction of this Hon’ble
Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for direction to the bank
for defreezing of the bank account of the petitioner which was freezed in the
proceeding in FIR No._________ under Section 406/420 of IPC registered with
Police Station _________pending before the Ld. CMM, Sh. S.K. Arora; Saket
Court, New Delhi.
2. That
the brief facts of the case are as under:-
A. During
the course of investigation, bank accounts of the petitioner company has been
freezed by the investigating officer.
B. That the
Allegations in the Present FIR has nothing to do with the account of the
company. Petitioner company has come to know form the bank through their letter
about freezing of the account.
C. It is
further submitted some of the complainants / investors have lodged the
complaint against the petitioner relating to one of the site (Project) with the
Police in ______, though while hearing in the bail application Hon’ble High
Court at Punjab and Haryana High Court pleased to grant interim bail to ___________
subject to the fulfillment of the undertaking tendered by ___________ that he
would make monthly payment of Rs. 10 Crores to the unallottees investors, it is
pertinent here in to mention that petitioner is making payment to the various
investors in term of the orders passed by Hon’ble High Court at Punjab and
Harayana.
D. It is
further submitted that there is no disobedience of the directions as passed by
the Hon’ble Court at Punjab and Haryana High Court.
E. In view
of the fact that group chairman _____________ is making payment of Rs. ______
to the investors as such freezing of the account by the investigating officer
is against the spirit of that order as the freezing of the bank account of petitioner
company is coming on the way for disbursement of money to the investors, even
otherwise no prejudice would be caused to the prosecution if the application
for defreezing of the bank account is allowed.
F. The petitioner
states that the Investigating officer has absolutely no jurisdiction or power
under any of the provisions
of the Criminal Procedure Code to freeze the accounts
of the petitioner company.
G. Furthermore
the freezing of the accounts have now rendered the performance of the Company
impossible, due to the illegal action of the police and Performance of day to
day functioning of the company is an integral part of the activities of the
company. All such activities will come to a standstill if the bank accounts
stand frozen.
H. It is
further submitted that the power of the police to freeze any account can be
exercised only if there was any direct nexus between the crime and the said
account. The freezing of accounts have been resorted to only in case of
misappropriation and corruption where as in the present case the failure of the
project is because of some other reasons where no criminality is involved.
I. It is
further submitted that the account Number __________ with _______ is Escrow
account with M/s. ________ Capital Limited having amount of Rs. 24 lakhs around
and by freezing of this account, the progress of this project got stalled, as
stated above the said account is an escrow account and its operation is
essential for the completion of the project.
J. It is
further submitted that the money is required to be drawn to meet the
expenditure of the petitioner company towards day to day functioning
K. The
action of the police in freezing of the accounts is mala fide and intended to
create terror and to bring the activities of the company and money is required
to be drawn to meet the expenditure of the company.
3. That
before invoking the action of freezing of the bank account by the Investigating
officer has not satisfactorily explained as to how the future transactions and
activities of the company can have any nexus to the crime of the past.
4. A
reading of the provision of Section 102 of Cr.P.C. clearly indicates the scope
of the power under the provision and that it is an exhaustive provision. Only
two categories of properties are mentioned, namely, (1) alleged or suspected to
have been stolen, or (2) which may be found under circumstances which create
suspicion of the commission of any offence. No other categories can be included
or deemed to be included as may otherwise be possible in an expansive
definition by using certain other expressions in addition such as "as the
case may be", "as the authorities deem fit and necessary", etc.,
which may render the provision an inclusive and illustrative one and not an
exhaustive one.
5. However,
without admitting only for the sake of arguments, it is submitted that the
alleged offence having been completed long back, the checking of the accounts
in relation to the aforementioned case can be only as regards past events and
accounts. Any checking would be relevant only with reference to past
transactions. Section
102,
Cr.P.c., cannot have any nexus to the future transactions or the regular
activities of the Company.
6. The
day-to-day activities of the company and the money which they receive or spend
for such day-to-day activities can have absolutely no relevance to the offences
alleged to have been committed for the investigation into those offences.
7. The petitioner
submits that if all these bank accounts
are frozen, the company would not be able to disburse weekly wages to his
employees besides being crippled from running his day-to-day company and the
business since all his monetary transactions are routed through these banks; that the action of the police
to freeze the bank accounts held by the company.
8. That aggrieved from the freezing of bank
account of the petitioner by the IO in the FIR No._________ under Section
406/420 of IPC registered with Police Station _________pending before the Ld.
CMM, Sh. S.K. Arora; Saket Court, New Delhi, petitioner is forced to file the
present petition.
GROUNDS : -
A.
B
C
D. That the Ld. CMM failed to appreciate that petitioner seeks
further investigation in the captioned matter qua these facts as stated above.
That our constitution grants the valuables right to the applicant for a fair
trial for duty casts upon the investigating officer to carry out the
investigation in a fair manner and in the present case investigating officer
has failed to collect the material / evidence which was enough to prove falsity
of the case of the investigation.
E. That the Ld. CMM committed serious
illegality by passing the order against the petitioner and did not properly
considered the fact on record itself.
F. That Ld. CMM failed to
appreciate while prolonging the application of the petitioner for defreezing of
the bank account of the petitioner is totally erroneous and contrary to the law
and guidelines, as settled by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India as well as the
Hon’ble High Court of Delhi.
9. That grave prejudice and irreparable loss
would be caused to the petitioner if the relief prayed for is not granted.
10. That the impugned order is bad on the facts
as well as on the merits of the case and is liable to be set aside by this
Hon’ble Court.
11. That the
petitioner has no other alternative remedy but to approach this Hon’ble Court
through present petition to prevent as grave miscarriage of justice and in
order to secure ends of justice.
12. That it
is submitted that there is inherent defect in the order under challenge and if
proceedings is continued then there is chances of miscarriage of justice and it
needs interference by this Hon’ble Court under section 482 of Cr.P.C.
13. That the petitioner craves the leave of this
Hon’ble Court to raise such other or further ground that may be available to
them at the time of hearing of the present petition.
14. The petitioner has not filed any similar petition in
the above noted matter either before this Hon’ble Court or before Hon’ble
Supreme Court of India.
P R A Y E R :-
In the facts and circumstances of the
case, it is respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to:-
A. Direct the bank / IO to defreezing of the
bank account of the petitioner in the proceeding in FIR No._________ under
Section 406/420 of IPC registered with Police Station _________pending before
the Ld. CMM, Sh. S.K. Arora; Saket Court, New Delhi,
in the interest of justice.
C. Pass such other order or orders as this
Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper interest he interest of justice.
DELHI PETITIONER
THROUGH
DATED
_________
ADVOCATES
_____________,
New
Delhi-110013.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
CRL. MISC. APP. NO. ______ OF 2016.
IN
CRL. MISC. (MAIN) PETITION No. ______
OF 2016.
IN
THE MATTER OF :-
__________________ : PETITIONER
VERSUS
FIR
No. _________
U/S.:
406/420 IPC
P.S.: __________
APPLICATION
FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILLING CERTIFIED COPIES OF THE ANNEXXURES UNDER SECTION 482
OF CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE.
MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH; -
1.
That
the petitioner has filed Annexures. Along with the main petition in order to
support the petition and the Annexures filed is the true, correct and compared
copies of the original.
2.
That
the petitioner shall apply for obtaining the certified copies of the Annexures
and undertakes to file the same as soon as the same is made available by
copying agency concerned.
It is most respectfully prayed that
the petitioner may kindly be exempted from filling the certified copies of the
Annexures.
DELHI PETITIONER
DATED
_________
ADVOCATES
_____________,
New
Delhi-110013.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
CRL. MISC. APP. NO. ______ OF 2016.
IN
CRL. MISC. (MAIN) PETITION No. ______
OF 2016.
IN
THE MATTER OF :-
__________________ : PETITIONER
VERSUS
__________________________________ : RESPONDENT
AFFIDAVIT
Affidavit
of Sh. ………. …………… M/s. _____________,
………………………., New Delhi, do hereby solemnly affirm
and declare, on oath, as under: -
1.
That I am the petitioner in the above
mentioned petition and am therefore, competent to swear this affidavit.
2.
That upon my instruction, my advocate,
is filing this Application for Exemptions from Filing Certified Copies, in the
above-mentioned case, and I am fully conversant with the facts of the same.
That I say that the facts stated therein are true and correct to my knowledge.
Any annexures filed along with the Application are true copies of their
respective originals.
DEPONENT
VERIFICATION :-
Verified at New
Delhi on this ____ day of ______, 2016 that the contents of the above affidavit
are true and correct to my knowledge. No
part of it is false and nothing material is concealed therefrom.
DEPONENT
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
CRL. MISC. (MAIN) PETITION No. ______
OF 2016.
IN
THE MATTER OF: -
__________________ : PETITIONER
VERSUS
AFFIDAVIT
Affidavit of Sh. ………. …………… M/s. _____________,
………………………., New Delhi, do hereby solemnly affirm and declare, on oath, as under:
-
1. That I am the petitioner in the above
mentioned case and as such I am conversant with the facts and circumstances of
the case, and hence competent to swear this Affidavit.
2. That the contents of the accompanying
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. have been read over and explained to me
in vernacular language and having understood the same I say that the facts
stated therein are true to the best of my knowledge and belief and nothing
material has been concealed therefrom.
VERIFICATION :-
Verified at Delhi on this ___ day of _______,
2016. That the contents of the above Affidavit are true and correct to my
knowledge, no part of it is false and nothing material has been concealed
therefrom.
DEPONENT