XXXXX & ASSOCIATES
LEGAL CONSULTANT & ADVOCATE
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Office No.
___________________________________
Mob :-_______________ E-Mail:-____________________
Date: ___________
REGD.
POST / EMAIL
To,
XXXXX
Advocate
C/o
____________________
XXXXXXX
Email:
_________________
Sub: Reply to your legal notice dated XXXX
issued by you on behalf of your client Sector- XXXXXXXXX.
Dear
Sir,
About your legal notice dated XXXX, received on XXXX,
addressed to my client XXXX at X, I have been instructed to give a reply to
the same as under:-
At the very outset, I would like to
inform you that your notice is based on information supplied by your client. It
is pertinent to mention that my client is not going through the contents and
allegations of your notice as my client was willing to resolve the issue amicably. The performance of the obligations on her part has become completely
impracticable and the change of circumstances due to the nCovid-19 pandemic has
completely upset the very foundation of her financial condition, therefore,
rendering its performance impracticable and impossible.
As your client is aware, nCovid-19 virus (“Covid”) infected the entire world leading to a pandemic and
widespread causalities. Covid virus started significantly showing its presence
in India in 20XX and resultantly, the entire country was forced into a nationwide
lockdown. The said lockdown was thereafter respectively extended till 20XX and
is currently operational in one form or the other. The same led to a situation whereby my client's entire earning operations have seen colossal losses and are on the brink of
shutting down. Hence, the question of performing the obligations which was impracticably not possible during that
period and the exaggerated charges levied by your client are liable to be waived
as the same was unreasonable and unacceptable.
The current situation has led to a scenario where the allotted apartment
has become useless to my client and is a burden. The performance of the obligations on her part
has become completely impracticable and the change of circumstances due to the
nCovid-19 pandemic has completely upset the very foundation of the execution of
the allotment, therefore, rendering its performance during the period of the pandemic impracticable and impossible for my client for which my client
regularly contacted and visited your office for the same but you linger on
the issue on pretext or other.
I advised me that given the
exaggerated charges levied by your client upon my client which are unnecessary
and unreasonable and your client raised the demand after two years and my
client personally visited your office regularly to make the payment and
settle all the accounts but you didn’t give any satisfactory answer to my
client and linger on the issue on one pretext or other and now your client
sending the present notice and claiming the exaggerated amount on various accounts
like CAM charges, holding charges, exorbitant interest and other charges which are
unfair, unreasonable and unacceptable.
Therefore
by all these activities of your client, it is very much evident that
your client is giving false and unreliable information to you which doesn’t have
any ground reality.
Parawise Reply On Merits:-
1.
Contents of para 1 of your noticeable
matter of record, need no reply.
2.
Contents of para 2 of your notice
are a matter of fact and need no reply.
3.
Contents of para 3 of your notice
are a matter of record and need no reply.
4.
Contents of para 4 of your notice are
false, wrong, concocted, and denied. It is submitted that your client
didn’t offer any possession to my client. The third tranche of payment, as
per the Payment Plan, was supposed to be demanded by your client after the
application of the Occupancy Certificate (“OC”). However, there were no demands
for the completion of the project raised by your client from my client even
until the promised date of handover of possession within 36 months. you have
offered the possession of the property on ______ only after a delay of ____
months even after considering the grace period. It is pertinent to note that
before 20XX-XX, my client regularly contacted your client to enquire about
the status of the project and want to make the payment and settled the accounts
with your client, but your client failed to respond to my client despite
repeated physical visits to your client. Accordingly, your client was misled to
believe that the completion of construction was happening promptly and therefore did not make any demand for money. It is submitted that my client
had both, the willingness and capability, to make the said payments as per the
agreed schedule; however, the same was delayed only on account of the delay
in construction by your client. It is further pertinent to mention that my
client made multiple attempts via personal visits to your client's office to make
the payment and settled the accounts in the year 20XX-20XX but your client did
not provide any satisfactory answers to my client’s requests.
That Sec.
19(2) of the Real Estate (Regulation &Development) Act [“RERA”] entitles
the allottees with the right to know the status of construction of the
concerned project and levies a duty on the promoter to inform the allottee
about the status of construction as agreed as per the plan. Sec. 19(2) of the
Act reads as follows:
“(2) The allottee shall be entitled
to know the stage-wise schedule of completion of the project, including
the provisions for water, sanitation, electricity, and other amenities and
services as agreed to between the promoter and the allottee by the terms and conditions of the agreement for sale.”
It is submitted
that in blatant violation of the aforesaid Sec. 19(2), your client did not
bother to inform my client regarding the status of construction even though the agreed time limit for completion of construction and handover of
possession i.e. February 2017, had already passed. It is this delay caused by
your client coupled with the non-responsive nature and dilatory tactics used by
your client that developed a sense of deep distrust for your client in the
minds of my client.
5.
Contents of para 5 of your notice
are false, wrong, concocted, and denied. It is denied that several letters/emails
including email/letters dated _______ and _______ wherein requesting to pay (i)
balance sale consideration (ii) CAM charges/maintenance charges (iii) deposit
including interest bearing maintenance deposit and other charges and (iv) submit
stamp papers showing payment of stamp duty and registration charges for
registration of conveyance deed in respect of the said apartment as alleged. It
is further denied that despite repeated requests and reminders sent by your
client, my client has failed and neglected to make the aforesaid payments and
therefore failed to register the conveyance deed and also failed to take
possession of the said Apartment., however, it was your client who made no communication whatsoever to my
client despite repeated personal visits at the office of your client for
settling the accounts and made the payments, that the completion of construction
of the aforementioned project was facing considerable delays and possession of
the said unit will not be handed over to my client as per the originally agreed
date. It is pertinent to mention here that now your client continued to send
further communication regarding payment for other stages but made no mention of
the delays in the project.
6.
Contents of para 6 of your notice
are false, wrong, concocted, and denied. It is submitted that given the exaggerated charges
levied by your client upon my client which are unnecessary and unreasonable and
your client raised the demand after two years of completion of a project and my
client personally visited your office regularly to make the payment and settle
all the accounts but you didn’t give any satisfactory answer to my client and linger
on the issue on one pretext or other and now your client sending the present
notice and claiming the exaggerated amount on various accounts like CAM
charges, holding charges, exorbitant interest and other charges which are
unfair, unreasonable and unacceptable.
7.
Contents of para 7 of your notice,
it is submitted that my client was very well aware of the provision of
registration and its consequences if a delay occurred. The delay in offering
the possession as well as completion of the project was solely on the part of
your client and my client regularly approach your client in the year 20XX-20XX
and make personal
visits to your client’s office regularly to make the payment and settle all the
accounts but your client didn’t give any satisfactory answer to my client and
linger on the issue on one pretext or other.
8.
Contents of para 8 of your notice
are false, wrong, concocted, and denied. It is denied that my client
did not make the payment towards sale consideration, interest has accrued which
is an on date is Rs. XXXX/-. It is submitted that regularly visited your
client’s office for settling the accounts and make the payments, but your
client is adamant to entertain my client and refused to give any satisfactory
answer to my client to date, resulting thereof the present notice has been sent
on exaggerated charges levied upon my client which was unreasonable and liable
to be waived off.
9-10. Contents of paras9-10 of your notice are
false, wrong, concocted, and denied. It is denied that my client is
liable to pay any holding charges from the expiry of the due date towards
payment of CAM commencement date till takes actual possession of the Apartment.
It is further denied that your client already offered the possession and
thereafter several reminders were also sent towards registration of the
conveyance deed and for taking possession of the said apartment. It is further
denied that my client is only responsible and/or liable for non-registration of
the conveyance deed and for not taking possession of the said apartment. It is
further denied that my client completely failed and neglected to comply with the
obligation to pay the stamp duty and registration charges to register
the conveyance deed and take possession of the said apartment. It is further
denied that my client is also liable to pay an amount of Rs. XXXX/- as the cost
of this legal notice. Your client concerning the offer the possession and several reminders sent to my
client misrepresented the facts with a mala fide intention. My client did not
make any further payments concerning these demands as no demand was raised
by your client and when my client approached your client for settling the
accounts and make the payments you failed to give any satisfactory answer, hence
it is submitted that the project was facing considerable delays and the
originally agreed date of handover of possession had already passed with no
communication from your client on any such expected delays. My client, already
cautious due to the misrepresentations of your client, even after repeated
requests, did not receive any satisfactory response from your client on any of
the clarifications sought, and thus refrained from making any further payments
towards the allotted project owing to the mala fide intentions of your client. The
possession was offered after a delay of approximately …… months from the
original agreed date and your client has to date, not offered any explanation
whatsoever in writing to my client concerning such considerable delays.
Your client has not taken into account these charges while calculating the
final pending balance of my client and has instead added arbitrary additional
payment obligations upon my client.
My client,
without due consideration to the already deposited payments, has continued to
arbitrarily charge exponential delayed payment/holding charges and has
continued to misrepresent/conceal material facts throughout the years with a
mala fide intention. The erosion of trust, due to such constant misrepresentations
has caused great distress to my client who despite having attempted to clear
their doubts regarding the status of their Unit were faced with nothing but
unfair charges for the shortcomings that occurred on your client’s part.
Without prejudice to the aforesaid, it is further
submitted that your client has conveniently and maliciously failed to even
provide the detailed calculation or rate of interest that has been applied by your
client in raising the delay penalty/ interest charged upon my client. Your
client has failed to substantiate its demand and is merely trying to mislead my
client.
Sec. 18 of the RERA Act provides for return, interest, and amount of
compensation to be allowed to the allottees as reads as follows:
“18.
(1) If the promoter fails to complete or is unable to give possession of an
apartment, plot, or building —
(a)
by the terms of the agreement for sale or, as the case may be,
duly completed by the date specified therein; or
(b)
due to discontinuance of his business as a developer on account of suspension
or revocation of the registration under this Act or for any other reason, he
shall be liable on demand to the allottees, in case the allottee wishes to
withdraw from the project, without prejudice to any other remedy available, to
return the amount received by him in respect of that apartment, plot, building,
as the case may be, with interest at such rate as may be prescribed in this
behalf including compensation in the manner as provided under this Act:
Provided
that where an allottee does not intend to withdraw from the project, he shall
be paid, by the promoter, interest for every month of delay, till the handing
over of the possession, at such rate as may be prescribed.”
Accordingly, it is submitted that in consonance with
the provisions of Sec. 18(1) of the Act, your client is liable to cancel the
allotment in favor of my client in light of the default by your client and
refund the entire amount already paid by my client along with applicable
interest. It is stated without prejudice that alternatively, your client is
liable to pay my client with interest for every month of delay till the date of
handover of possession.
It has been held by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in the judgment
titled Pioneer Urban Land and Infrastructure Limited v. Govind Raghavan
& Ors. that ex-facie one-sided, unfair, and unreasonable terms in
Agreements with buyers constitute unfair trade practice. Further, even the
Hon’ble NCDRC in a recent judgment had categorically held that there should be
parity in the rate of interest to be paid by the builders and the homebuyers
for not complying with the terms of the agreement and it was suggested that
builders should pay the same rate of interest for delay in project that they
demand from buyers in case of delay in payment. The same proposition has
further been consolidated by the advent of RERA laws.
Without prejudice to the foregoing, it is submitted that my client is not
liable to pay any additional charges/ penalty to my client as mentioned in para
10 under the reply. The resultant delay, if any, is solely due to the delay
caused by your client and the negligent conduct of your client itself.
Further, your client has failed to substantiate its demand for additional
money on account of the charges with any proof regarding the same and has
merely cooked up false and fictitious numbers to harass my client in an attempt
to hide your client’s defaults. Therefore, it is submitted that the demands
made by your client are false and should not be accepted. On the contrary, it
is your client who is liable to pay interest on account of the delay in offering
possession to my client.
11. That
the contents of para 11 of your notice are false, wrong,
concocted, and denied. It is submitted that your client is not entitled
to hand over the existing project of my client to any Society, it will grave
prejudice caused to my client which will not compensate in terms of money. That you have not been inclined to
accept the request of my client and repeatedly demanded interest for the
delayed payment from my client. So the amount of interest demanded should be
waived. Your client had given all rosy pictures and had made false promises to
my client.
That time in this case was the essence of the contract in
as much as the project had to be completed within 36 months. The apartment was
never ready to be offered for possession.
My client is within his right to avoid the contract when
possession is not offered within a reasonable time and there is an inordinate
delay of a considerable number of years.
My client is entitled to compensation i.e. actual loss, expected
loss, and even to physical, mental, or even emotional suffering, insult or
injury or loss, and even payment of interest for injustice suffered by him.
As
such the ground/contents raised in your notice are false, unknown, shocking,
and frivolous. That the contents of your notice under reply is wrong and denied
as stated.
My
client is not prepared to bear with this shocking situation anymore and has
instructed me to initiate appropriate proceedings, but I have thought it
advisable to give you yet another opportunity the last to withdraw
the notice.
I
trust, however, by timely action, you will obviate the necessity of any
unpleasant steps having been taken against the client. It will be in your client's interest to withdraw the notice.
This
notice has no legal force and still your client proposes to take any legal
action against my client, in that event, your client shall be doing so at its costs, risks, and consequences thereof which you may please advise your
client.
In view thereof, it appears that
there is dispute arose between my client and your client, as my client
through this response requests your client to have one meeting to settle of
accounts to avoid any kind of unwarranted proceeding against each
other.
My client hereby calls upon your client to settle our accounts at the earliest
mutually and advise us to
withdraw the present notice.
A copy of this notice has been kept
in my office for further reference and action.
(XX)
Advocate