IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) NO. OF
2024
[Petition under Section 25
of the code of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 read with Article 139 A of the
Constitution of India, read with order XXXVI-B of the Supreme Court of India
Rules, 2013, for transfer of the case titled as âXXXXXXX v. XXXXXX â being
Divorce Petition bearing HMA No.XXXXX , pending before the Ld. Principal Judge,
Family Court; Karkardooma Courts, Delhi]
IN THE MATTER OF:
Mrs. XXXXXX , aged ____ years,
W/o Sh. ________________
D/o_____________________,
R/o_____________________________
Presently at: âŠâŠâŠâŠâŠ.
Gandhidham, Gujarat
âŠPETITIONER
VERSUS
Mr.XXXXX, aged ___ Years,
S/o Sh. _____________________
R/o________________________,
, Delhi-1100__. ⊠RESPONDENT
PETITION UNDER SECTION 25 OF THE CODE OF THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE, 1908
READ WITH ARTICLE 139 A OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, READ WITH ORDER XXXVI-B
OF THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RULES 2013 FOR TRANSFER OF THE CASE TITLED âXXXXX
V. XXXXXX â BEING DIVORCE PETITION BEARING HMA NO.XXXX, PENDING BEFORE THE LD.
PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT; KARKARDOOMA COURTS, DELHI.
To,
THE HONâBLE CHIEF JUSTICE
OF INDIA,
AND HIS COMPANION JUSTICES
OF THE
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA.
THE HUMBLE
PETITIONER OF THE ABOVE NAMED
MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:-
1.
That the present Transfer
Petition has been filed by the Petitioner under Section 25 of the Code of Civil
Procedure, 1908 and Article 139 A of the Constitution of India read with Order
XXXVI-B of the Supreme Court Rules, 1966 inter-alia for order and direction
from this Honâble Court for transfer of the case titled as âXXXXX v. XXXXX â being Divorce Petition bearing HMA
No.XXXX , pending before the Ld. Principal Judge, Family Court; Karkardooma
Courts, Delhi.
2.
That the brief facts
leading to the present Transfer Petition are as under:
i.
That the Petitioner got married with the Respondent on 06.xx.2013 at Delhi
according to Hindu Rites, Customs and ceremony with great pomp and show and in
the said marriage father of the Petitioner spent huge amount and all articles
are in the custody of the Respondent and in laws.
ii.
That after the marriage the Petitioner joined her matrimonial home and
out of this wedlock one male child namely Master A was born on 15.xx.20215 and
entire medical expenses borne by the Petitionerâs family.
iii.
That in the year 2013, the father of the Respondent had initially
approached the Petitioner's father for her hand in marriage. The Petitioner
agreed to a marriage with Respondent based on the representations and
assurances provided by the Petitioner and his family members and believing that
her future would be happy and secure with the Respondent family.
iv.
That the marriage between the Petitioner and the Respondent was
solemnized on 06.XX.2013 at Delhi according to Hindu Rites and ceremonies. The
Respondent and his family members made several demands relating to the kind of
wedding that would take place and ultimately led to a wedding with great pump
and show and the entire expenditure was incurred by the parents of the
Petitioner. The Respondent and his family members forced the Petitioner's
family to meet various demands relating to jewellery, household items, and
other items for them as well as other relatives of the Respondent and the same
will be given in complaints before competent authority.
v.
That after the solemnization of the marriage, that the Petitioner was
shocked to see a different demands of Respondentâs family members on dowry
articles, despite the acquiescence of the Petitioner's family in fulfilling all
demands made by them, the mother-in-law and sister-in-law of the Petitioner
were not happy and would constantly taunt and insult her and her parents for
not getting jewellery items as per their demands. The Petitioner was surprised
to see their greed and covetousness since they are well-off as a family. The
Petitioner communicated her inhibitions about the Respondent's family and in particular
his elder sisters Mrs.R, Mrs.M, Mrs.S and Mrs.R Mami ji and her brother Mr.D.
The Respondentâs mother demanded that the Petitioner should give all her
jewellery including her stridhan for safekeeping. Relying upon the
representations made by her, the Petitioner entrusted all her jewellery,
stridhan etc. and the entire jewellery articles, istridhan articles are into
the custody of Respondentâs mother.
vi.
That the Petitioner belongs to a very adjustable close-knit family with
a deep emphasis on family values and culture and tolerated everything since she
wanted to continue this relation as she loves so much to the Respondent and
never expected the same from Respondent.
vii.
The Petitioner has not sufficient income to maintain herself and her
minor son while the Respondent has sufficient source of income and still has
not even cared to offer a single paisa to the Petitioner and her for their
maintenance, as such the Respondent has breached the obligatory marital duties
and obligations to maintain the Petitioner and her minor son.
viii.
That this kind of cruel and unfair treatment was completely unacceptable
to the Petitioner as it was totally against her dignity and self-respect. The Respondent
has provided the Petitioner with no financial security. The Petitioner is
unable to look after her minor son as such she has no choice but to fall back
on her elder sister for financial support. Basic need like food, clothing, and
education is being provided from the money given by her elder sister.
Therefore, over and above the maintenance she is due under law, the Petitioner is
entitled to get compensation from Respondent and his family members for the
cruel behaviour and conduct, mental, physical and psychological torture
suffered at their hands.
ix.
That
all the belongings and jewellery of the Petitioner is still with the mother of Respondent and the Petitioner has been forced to live a life
full of misery and cruelty resulting from acts being committed by the Respondent
and his parents and it was the Respondent who deserted his wife from his
company for greed of his second marriage with someone else.
x.
That the Respondent is greedy for money and in past he had taken approx.
Rs.12 lakhs from Petitioner and want to marry with another girl for money only
and his family members supporting for the same otherwise no reason available
for the Respondent to leave the Petitioner and her minor son.
xi.
That the Petitioner being the legally wedded wife of the Respondent,
shown her love, affection, attachment, willingness towards the Respondent and
his other family members and still believe that she could live her matrimonial
life with the Respondent as the Petitioner having one minor son and did not
want to leave the Respondent as she is legally wedded wife of Respondent and
believed in one philosophy that âSHADI JEEWAN ME SIRF EK BAAR HOTI HAIâ she
also maintained the dignity and respect of the family of the Respondent and
always fulfilled her marital status / obligations with the Respondent and his
family members on different occasions. The Petitioner tolerated everything with
this hope that one day better sense would prevail upon the Respondent and he
would mend his ways and the Petitioner still hoped for the same. The Petitioner
was / is having too much love and affection with the Respondent but Respondent
has scattered all the dreams of the Petitioner by filing the false and
frivolous petition of divorce. The only problem of Respondent and his family
members are they are greedy for money and want money from Petitioner and her
family members. The Petitioner never dared to talk either with the Respondent
or with his mother in high volume in entire life. The Respondent, his parents
and sister demanded dowry and beaten Petitioner on number of occasions and for
the same, the Petitioner reserves the right to initiate criminal complaints
against the Respondent and his family members. The Respondent left the
Petitioner without any of her fault and till date, she is not aware why
Respondent behaving like this and why the said divorce petition filed by him
before this Ld. Family Court, Delhi. The Respondent had filed the false and
frivolous petition before Ld. Family Court for getting the divorce and the same
is not maintainable in the eyes of law.
xii.
It is at this stage, when
the Petitioner wife stood for the truth and stated to the Respondent that she
will file the complaint against the Respondent and his family members for the
act of cruelty and demand of dowry, the Respondent got irked and filed the
false and frivolous case against the Petitioner wife being the petition under Section 13(1)(ia) &
(ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, before the Honâble Principal Judge,
Family Court, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi titled âXXXXX v.XXXXXâ being HMA
Petition bearing No.XXXXX .
xiii.
It is respectfully
submitted that since the prayer sought in this proceedings are to transfer the
case filed by the respondent the Petitioner is intentionally not detailing the
extent of cruelty and neglect done by the Respondent husband so as to avoid
diverting the scope of these proceedings. The Petitioner reserves her liberty
to file the detail response as per the need.
xiv.
That the Petitioner has
not filed any other Transfer Petition in this Honâble Court or in any other
Court, for transfer of this petition. The Petitioner is, therefore, approaching
this Honâble Court under Article 139 A of the Constitution of India and Section
25 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 read with Order XXXVI-B of the Supreme
Court Rules, 2013 for transfer of Petition for Divorce under Hindu Marriage
Act, 1955 titled as âUphaar
Sharma v. Madhvi Sharmaâ being HMA Petition bearing No.174/2024 pending
before Honâble Principal Judge,
Family Court, Karkardooma, Delhi to Ld. Family Court, Gandhidham, Gujarat or any other Family Court at Gujrat.
3.
The Petitioner submits
that the same is required in order to meet the ends of justice and for
impartial and fair trial and the following grounds, each of which is without
prejudice to the other.
GROUNDS:
A.
Because the divorce
proceedings is an instrument to exert pressure and coerce the petitioner wife
to acquiesce to nefarious demands of the respondent-husband. Basis, the
identity documents of the Petitioner, Petitioner and her son are presently
residing at Gandhidham, Gujarat and her son Master A-Aged- 9 Years studying in class 4th in XXXXX School,
Gandhidham, Gujrat. Even, as per the Respondent husbandâs own averment
that in Divorce Petition in para 2 in the status and place of residence of Petitioner
before and after marriage at XXXX Nagar, Agra. Thus, by way of his own
admission neither of the Petitioner reside in Delhi at the time of filing of
the divorce proceedings and worked at Gujarat. Thus, filing of the divorce
proceedings in Delhi can clearly be inferred as a tactic to exert pressure and
coerce Petitioner wife to acquiesce to the nefarious demands of the Respondent
husband.
B.
Because the divorce petition filed by
Respondent is just to harass the Petitioner as Respondent knows that at present
the Petitioner is residing at Gandhidham, Gujrat near to her elder sister Anjali
along with her only son Master A-Aged- 9 Years studying in class 4th
in XXXXX School, , Gandhidham, Gujrat and not possible for Petitioner to
contest the case from Gandhidham before the Honâble Court of Delhi and it is
important to mention here that the said divorce case proceedings filed by
Respondent in Delhi as Respondentâs father is a practicing lawyer in Delhi
District Courts and Respondent and want
to create problems, harassment to the Petitioner and her only son Master A Aged-9 years and the Petitioner not
able to contest the case in Delhi.
C.
The parties had a
tumultuous married life. Having married for over 11 years, the Petitioner wife
all throughout tolerated the mercurial temper of the Respondent husband. On
various occasions, the Respondent husband also engaged in physical beatings to
the Petitioner wife; however, the Petitioner wife kept on sailing in the tumultuous
married journey for the sake of her child and family members. Needless to say,
the Respondent husband engaged himself in multiple counts of extramarital
relationships during these years.
D.
Because, the Petitioner
and her child residing and studying at Gandhidham, Gujarat. That the Respondent
has numerous connections and acquaintances living in the proximity of Delhi. It is important to mention here that
the present case filed by Respondent in Delhi as Respondentâs father is a
practicing lawyer in Delhi District Courts and Respondent and want to create
problems, harassment to the Petitioner her only son Master A Aged-9 years and
the Petitioner not able to contest the case in Delhi.
E.
Because the Petitioner
has to make various accommodations (i.e. her health, travel and safety etc.)
every time she has to travel from Gujarat to Delhi. That the distance from
Gandhidham, Gujarat to Delhi is about 1132 Kms and it is very difficult for the
Petitioner to travel alone as there is no direct connectivity and the Petitioner
is the only person taking care of her school going child namely Master A -Aged- 9 Years studying in class 4th
in XXXXX School, Gandhidham, Gujrat and she cannot go out of station
left behind her minor school going child. Furthermore, the Petitionerâs safety
and well-being as the distance took 20 hours to reach from Gujarat to Delhi and
total travelling time is about 40 hours plus which will cost to her minimum to
minimum approx. 10,000/- (including traveling cost, foods, stay in Hotel and misc.
expense etc.).
F.
Admittedly, the
Petitioner aged around 39 years is working as âŠâŠâŠâŠ at Gujarat not only sustain
herself, but also to pay off school fees of the child and rent per month.
Admittedly, the Respondent husband has not contributing in the School Fees etc.
of the child since separation and the Petitioner so is managing the whole thing
as well as the payment of the household expenses and Fees etc. Thus, frequent
travel to Delhi by train/bus/car would severely jeopardize the Petitioner.
G.
Because the respondent,
who has enough source of income and capable to manage to come to Punjab and it
will not be inconvenient for the Respondent to come to Gujarat and to attend
the proceeding therein, but it is wholly impossible for the petitioner to attend
the proceeding at Delhi. It is pertinent to mention here that Respondent and
his family residing at Delhi and with a sole intention to harass the Petitioner
has filed the case in Delhi.
H.
Because travelling alone
to Delhi, which is the place of Residence of Respondent and all his family
members is not safe as the family of Respondent might intimidate her and put
pressure on her and in her current fragile situation it is not suitable for the
Petitioner to travel to Delhi all alone. Also, the Petitioner is not having
source of income and hardly to maintain her son.
I.
Because at no point of
time, did the Petitioner leave her matrimonial home. Rather, she was thrown out
of her matrimonial house by the Respondent and his parents. The Petitioner was
physically assaulted by the Respondent and his family members and was facing
continuous harassment for bringing fewer articles in dowry. Thus, she was
forced to return to her parents at Delhi.
It may be further pertinent to note here that at the material point of
time, she was not allowed to take away her belongings and all her âstridhanâ is
still lying with the Respondent and his family.
J.
Because it will be very
difficult for the Petitioner to travel to Delhi from Gujarat alone which is
more than 20 hours away and there is no one to accompany Petitioner. Also, it is pertinent to mention that
travelling alone to Delhi, which is the hometown of Respondent and all his
family members is not safe as the family of Respondent might intimidate her and
put pressure on her and in her current fragile situation it is not suitable for
the Petitioner to travel to Delhi all alone.
K.
Because the Petitioner is
not familiar with the know-abouts of Delhi as she stayed there only for a few
days after marriage and will feel intimidated by the presence of all the
relatives of Respondent, who might take advantage of her unawareness of the
place. The inability of the Petitioner to contest proceedings at a place away
from her ordinary residence will eventually result in denial of justice.
L.
Because the
Respondent-husband has filed the said HMA Petition under Hindu Marriage Act,
1955 with mala-fide intentions and he seeks to harass the Petitioner by
dragging her into unnecessary litigation at such a far flung place. It may be
noted that when the Petitioner tried to sober him up and restore her breaking
matrimonial relationship, she was tortured and thrown out of her matrimonial
house.
M.
Because in view of the
financial and physical hardships faced by the Petitioner to participate in HMA
proceedings instituted 1132kms away from the ordinary residence of the
Petitioner and, under such circumstances, the HMA proceedings instituted before
the Ld. Principal Judge, Family Court, Karkardooma, Delhi may be transferred to
concerned Principal Judge, Family Court in Gujarat.
4.
That petitioner states
that no earlier petition was filed by the petitioner for transfer the
proceeding of Divorce Petition bearing HMA No.XXXXX pending before the Ld. Principal Judge, Family
Court, Karkardooma, Delhi.
PRAYER:
It is, therefore, respectfully prayed that this Honâble Court maybe
pleased to:-
a)
Allow this Transfer
Petition and direct for transfer of case titled as âXXXXXX v. XXXXXXX â being
Divorce Petition bearing HMA No.XXXXX, pending before the Ld. Principal Judge,
Family Court; Karkardooma Courts, Delhi to the Ld. Family Courts, Gujarat, or
any other competent Court in the jurisdiction of Gujarat Courts.
b)
Pass any other order or
further orders as this Honâble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and
circumstances of the present case.
AND FOR THIS ACT OF
KINDNESS AND JUSTICE THE PETITIONER SHALL AS IN DUTY BOUND EVER PRAY.
DATED:
NEW DELHI:
ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) NO. OF
20__
IN THE MATTER
OF:-
XXXXXXXXXXXX ⊠PETITIONER
VERSUS
XXXXXXXXXXXX ⊠RESPONDENT
AFFIDAVIT
I, XXXXX , D/o_________________,
aged about ___ years, R/o âŠâŠâŠâŠ.Gandhidham, Gujarat., do hereby solemnly affirm
and state on oath as under:
1. That I am the petitioner in
the above noted case and am well conversant with the facts and circumstances of
the case and am competent to swear this affidavit.
2. That I state that
I have read over and
understood the contents of the Synopsis,
List of Dates and Events from page nos. _____ to _____, Transfer Petition from
para nos. _____ to ____ at page
Nos. ____ to _____
alongwith the I.As. no.____ to page ____) have been drafted
by my counsel under my instructions and the averments made therein have been
read and understood by me. I further state that the averments made therein are
true and correct to my knowledge and belief.
3. That the annexures P-1 to
P-3 to the Transfer Petition are true copies of their respective originals.
DEPONENT
VERIFICATION: -
I, the
deponent above named, do hereby verify and state that the contents of this
affidavit are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and nothing is false
and nothing material has been concealed therefrom.
Verified at New Delhi on this the day
_____of September, 2024.
DEPONENT