Supreme Court Imposes Penalty on States & UTs for Non-Compliance in Domestic Violence Act Implementation

Supreme Court Imposes Penalty on States & UTs for Non-Compliance in Domestic Violence Act Implementation

On February 18, the Supreme Court imposed a penalty of ₹5,000 on the states of Andhra Pradesh, Arunachal Pradesh, Himachal Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Meghalaya, Odisha, Telangana, West Bengal, Assam, and the Union Territories of Dadra and Nagar Haveli, Daman and Diu, Jammu and Kashmir, Ladakh and Lakshadweep for failing to submit a status report on the effective implementation of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (PWDVA).

The Court granted an additional two weeks for compliance, directing the penalized states and UTs to deposit the fine with the Supreme Court Mediation Centre.

A bench comprising Justices B.V. Nagarathna and N.K. Singh had previously passed an order on December 2, 2023, emphasizing the need for effective implementation of the PWDVA. This followed submissions by Senior Advocate Shobha Gupta, representing the petitioner, We The Women of India, a non-governmental organization.

Recommendations Submitted by the Petitioner:

1.     Appointment of Protection Officers – Each district must have at least one protection officer, as mandated by Section 8 of the Act, based on population size and the number of domestic violence cases reported.

2.     Training and Sensitization – Protection officers should receive regular legal training and sensitization to effectively support victims.

3.     Shelter Homes & Medical Facilities – States and UTs should establish adequate shelter homes and medical facilities for victims. Mission Shakti's 'One Stop Center’s may be utilized but should extend their stay beyond the current 3-5days limit.

4.     Legal Aid Services – District and State Legal Services Authorities should maintain a panel of lawyers to provide free legal assistance to victims.

5.     Implementation of the Act – While Mission Shakti and One Stop Centers may supplement the Act’s framework, they cannot replace its mandatory provisions. A National Portal should be created to provide comprehensive information about available support services.

6.     Periodic Review – The functional status of the 'Assistance Network' should be reviewed regularly.

7.     Centralized Fund Allocation – A dedicated funding scheme should be established for each State/UT to ensure effective implementation, including widespread awareness campaigns and stakeholder training.

8.     Cadre Structure for Protection Officers – Recruitment rules should be framed, and a structured cadre should be created to ensure adequate support for protection officers.

9.     Stakeholder Coordination – A compiled list of key stakeholders (protection officers, service providers, shelter homes, and medical facilities) should be available at police stations and local administrative offices. ASHA workers, Anganwadi workers, legal service authorities, and NGOs should collaborate to enhance outreach.

10. Data Collection and Analysis – A nationwide study should be conducted to assess distress calls to helplines (181, 100) and domestic violence complaints, facilitating better resource allocation.

11. Expedited Case Disposal – Given the significant delays in resolving domestic violence cases, especially those involving interim maintenance orders, the Court should mandate a time-bound resolution process.

Case Details:

WE THE WOMEN OF INDIA v UNION OF INDIA & ORS., W.P.(C) No. 1156/2021

 

Author : Neha Mishra

Posted on : 22,Feb,2025

Quick Contact
Copyright ©2025 Lawvs.com | All Rights Reserved