The interpretation of the Constitution has evolved through landmark judgments by the Supreme Court. In *Kesavananda Bharati* case (1973), the Court introduced the basic structure doctrine, limiting Parliament's power to amend the Constitution. In *Maneka Gandhi* case (1978), the right to life was interpreted to include the right to travel and live with dignity. In Navtej Singh Johar case (2018), the Court decriminalized homosexuality, expanding the scope of individual liberty. These judgments show how the Constitution is interpreted to meet changing social and legal needs.

The interpretation of the Constitution has evolved significantly through landmark judgments by the Supreme Court, shaping India’s legal and democratic framework.
Key examples include:
Kesavananda Bharati (1973) – Established the Basic Structure Doctrine, limiting Parliament's power to amend the Constitution.
Maneka Gandhi (1978) – Expanded the scope of Article 21, ensuring a broader interpretation of the right to life and personal liberty.
Navtej Johar (2018) – Decriminalized homosexuality, reinforcing individual dignity and equality under Articles 14 and 15.
These judgments reflect a shift from rigid interpretation to a progressive and dynamic approach, ensuring the Constitution remains relevant to contemporary needs.