Courts determine the urgency of a PIL based on several factors, including the public interest involved, the gravity of the situation, and whether the delay could cause irreparable harm. To argue for an expedited hearing, focus on demonstrating the magnitude of public interest, the potential for severe harm, and the need for immediate action.

Courts determine the urgency of a PIL by considering:
Public interest, gravity, and the risk of irreparable harm or damage if the matter is not heard promptly.
Whether the issue involves larger public interest or addresses genuine public harm and injury.
The possibility of irreparable injury or urgent need for intervention if the petition is delayed.
To argue effectively for an expedited hearing:
Clearly demonstrate the urgency and irreparable harm that will result from delay.
Emphasize the broader public interest and gravity of the issue.
Provide credible, verified facts and evidence supporting the need for immediate intervention.
Show that prior representations were made or explain why immediate action is necessary without waiting for a response.
Present a focused, well-prepared petition that highlights why the case should be prioritized over others.

Courts determine the urgency of a PIL based on factors like the immediacy of harm, public interest involved, and potential consequences of delay. To argue for expedited hearing, emphasize serious rights violations, ongoing damage, and the need for swift intervention, supported by strong evidence and clear legal grounds showing urgency.