Court:-
Pros: Binding decision, suitable for serious cases
Cons: Time-consuming, costly, public
ADR:-
Pros: Faster, cheaper, private, flexible
Cons: May not be binding, depends on cooperation
Choose based on urgency, cost, privacy, and nature of dispute.

For a first-time client, you can explain the choice between court and ADR as follows:
Court Litigation
Pros: Provides a formal, enforceable decision by a judge; sets legal precedent; suitable for complex or high-stakes disputes.
Cons: Usually more expensive, takes longer, is public (less privacy), and can be stressful and adversarial.

Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
Pros: Faster, less costly, more flexible, private, and helps preserve relationships. Parties have more control over the process and outcome.
Cons: Not all decisions are legally binding (except arbitration); may not set precedent; possible bias or power imbalance; limited right to appeal in some cases.

Going to Court (Litigation)
Pros:
Legally binding judgment: Enforceable by law.
Appeal process: You can challenge an adverse decision.
Public record: Useful if you want a precedent or transparency.

Cons:
Time-consuming: Cases can drag on for years.
Expensive: Legal fees, court fees, and other costs add up.
Stressful and formal: The process can be intimidating, especially for individuals.
Public: Court proceedings are generally not private.

Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
Includes arbitration, mediation, and conciliation.
Pros:
Faster resolution: Disputes are resolved quicker than in court.
Cost-effective: Lower legal and procedural costs.
Private and confidential: Ideal for sensitive matters.
Flexible process: Informal and more collaborative.
Preserves relationships: Especially useful in family, business, or partnership disputes.

Cons:
Not always binding: Mediation and conciliation depend on mutual agreement.
Limited appeal options: Arbitration awards are harder to challenge.
Unequal bargaining power: May disadvantage weaker parties in some cases.
Less structured: Can be unpredictable without legal oversight.