Lowering the age of criminal responsibility in light of increasing juvenile involvement in heinous crimes is a complex issue with arguments for and against. While some argue that it is necessary for public safety and to hold perpetrators accountable, others emphasize the importance of child development, rehabilitation, and potential for future societal contributions.

Lowering the age of criminal responsibility in response to increasing juvenile involvement in heinous crimes is controversial; while it may address public concerns about accountability, it risks ignoring the developmental immaturity and reformative needs of children. Instead, existing provisions already allow juveniles aged 16–18 to be tried as adults for serious offenses, balancing societal safety with child rights and rehabilitation