Yes, India should consider recognizing punitive damages in torts, especially in mass tort cases, to deter wrongful conduct, ensure corporate accountability, and provide justice beyond compensatory relief. This can strengthen consumer and environmental protection, provided it is balanced with safeguards against excessive or arbitrary awards.

Yes, there is a strong argument for recognizing punitive damages in torts, especially in mass tort cases, in India. Punitive damages, designed to punish egregious misconduct and deter future harm, can provide a crucial tool for holding responsible parties accountable and ensuring fair compensation for victims.

Yes, there is a strong argument for recognizing punitive damages in torts, especially in mass tort cases, in India. Punitive damages, designed to punish egregious misconduct and deter future harm, can provide a crucial tool for holding responsible parties accountable and ensuring fair compensation for victims.

India should recognize punitive damages in torts, especially in mass tort cases, as they serve not only to compensate victims but also to deter egregious, reckless, or profit-driven misconduct by powerful entities. While Indian courts have occasionally awarded punitive damages, their use is limited and not codified, highlighting the need for a clearer legal framework to ensure accountability and fair relief in large-scale harm cases