Mumbai Court Orders FIR Against Former SEBI Chief Madhabi Puri Buch & BSE Officials Over Regulatory Lapses

Mumbai Court Orders FIR Against Former SEBI Chief Madhabi Puri Buch & BSE Officials Over Regulatory Lapses

A Special Court in Mumbai has directed the Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB), Mumbai, to register an FIR against former SEBI chairperson Madhabi Puri Buch, three SEBI Whole-Time Members, and senior officials of the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE).

The order was passed by Special Judge S.E. Bangar (Prevention of Corruption Act) under Section 156(3) of the Cr.P.C., following a complaint by journalist Sapan Shrivastava (47). The court noted that the allegations indicate a "cognizable offence," warranting an FIR under relevant provisions of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), the Prevention of Corruption (PC) Act, and the SEBI Act. The ACB has been directed to submit a probe report within 30 days.

The investigation has been ordered against:

  • Madhabi Puri Buch (Former SEBI Chairperson)
  • Ashwani Bhatia, Anant Narayan G, Kamlesh Varshney (SEBI Whole-Time Members)
  • Sundararaman Ramamurthy (BSE Director)
  • Pramod Agarwal (Public Interest Director, BSE)

The judge emphasized the "gravity of the offence", citing prima facie evidence of regulatory lapses and collusion. The court highlighted the inaction of SEBI and law enforcement, stating that judicial intervention under Section 156(3) CrPC was necessary to ensure a fair and impartial investigation.

Allegations:

Shrivastava accused Madhabi Puri Buch and other SEBI and BSE officials of enabling the fraudulent listing of a company on the stock exchange while failing to take action against its alleged wrongdoings. He claimed that he and his family invested in shares of Cals Refineries Ltd (listed on BSE India) on December 13, 1994, and suffered significant losses due to regulatory failures.

According to the complaint, SEBI and BSE officials manipulated the market by permitting the company's unlawful listing and failing to protect investor interests, thereby facilitating corporate fraud.

The case now awaits further investigation based on the court’s directives.

Author : Neha Mishra

Posted on : 03,Mar,2025

Quick Contact
Copyright ©2025 Lawvs.com | All Rights Reserved