PUNE PORSCHE CASE: TRIAL COURT DENIES BAIL TO ACCUSED

Author : Advocate Abhinav Rai

Posted on : 27,Aug,2024

 PUNE PORSCHE CASE: TRIAL COURT DENIES BAIL TO ACCUSED

A local court in Pune on Thursday denied bail to six individuals, including the parents of a minor involved in the Kalyani Nagar Porsche car crash, who are accused of tampering with evidence.

The court strongly criticized the accused for allegedly conspiring to swap blood samples in an attempt to shield the minor driver from legal repercussions.

Additional District Judge UM Mudholkar rejected the bail pleas of Vishal and Shivani, the minor’s parents, who are accused of orchestrating the conspiracy; Dr. Shrihari Halnor and Dr. Ajay Taware, doctors at Sassoon Hospital who allegedly facilitated the illegal blood sample swap; and Ashpak Makandar and Amar Gaikwad, who are accused of acting as middlemen.

Judge Mudholkar stated that granting bail would send a "wrong message to society" and could obstruct the course of justice.

The court remarked, “Even before the blood of the victims/occupants of the motorcycle could dry on the road, the evidence tampering began and was largely completed, aided by monetary influence or other means in the middle of the night.”

He further commented that tampering appeared to be “in the genes/DNA of the modus operandi” in this case.

The case originates from a tragic incident on May 19, 2024, when the minor, referred to as a child in conflict with the law (CCL), allegedly drove a Porsche recklessly at high speed, resulting in the deaths of Anis Awadhiya and Ashwini Koshta, who were on a motorcycle.

According to the prosecution, within hours of the crash, Vishal and Shivani allegedly paid ₹3 lakh to Dr. Shrihari Halnor, who was responsible for collecting the minor's blood samples to determine if he was driving under the influence of alcohol.

The court order outlines that instead of taking the CCL's blood sample, Dr. Halnor allegedly substituted it with a sample from Shivani, the minor’s mother, to conceal the driver's intoxication.

The court stated, “After thoroughly analysing the chargesheet, it is evident that there is substance in the allegation that Vishal and Shivani conspired with Dr. Halnor, Dr. Taware, Ashpak Makandar, and Amar Gaikwad to replace the CCL's blood sample with Shivani's by offering a bribe to the doctors, with the assistance of Ashpak and Amar.”

The court also noted that evidence, including CCTV footage and call data records (CDRs), showed the accused coordinating the alleged crime at Sassoon Hospital during the night.

The court observed, “In the late hours of the night, all the accused gathered at Sassoon Hospital and played their respective roles in replacing the CCL's blood sample with Shivani's,” adding that witness statements supported these claims.

The court further underscored the seriousness of the alleged crime and the risk of evidence tampering if the accused were granted bail.

“The granting of bail at this stage would likely lead to tampering with witness testimony, thus obstructing justice for the victims, their families, and society at large,” the order stated.

The judge also dismissed the defence’s argument that the accused had limited opportunity to tamper with electronic or documentary evidence.

“While it may be true that the possibility of tampering with documentary and electronic evidence is negligible, the same cannot be said for the statements of witnesses, whose oral evidence in court is crucial,” the court noted.

However, the court rejected the prosecution’s comparison of the accused parents to notorious fugitives like Vijay Mallya and Nirav Modi, calling such comparisons “fanciful and deserving of rejection.”

Senior Advocate Harshad Nimbalkar, along with Advocates Sudhir Shah, Rishikesh Ganu, and Prasad Kulkarni, represented the bail applicants (accused).

Special Public Prosecutor Shishir Hiray represented the State.

Quick Contact
Copyright ©2023 Lawvs.com | All Rights Reserved